|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Whittier, Ca
Posts: 830
Likes: 102
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
.101 Under is the correct figure
__________________
Tony Janes 7941 STK, SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Dunnellon,FL
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]()
The reason you don't see any pre '60's cars racing is answered in the above pages....what are you going to race other than a '55-'57 Chevy and they aren't competitive under exisiting rules.
JimR
__________________
Jim Rountree |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Newport News, VA
Posts: 1,435
Likes: 371
Liked 129 Times in 59 Posts
|
![]()
So what are the chances that NHRA will open up the Stock Car Classification Guide and add something besides pre-1960 Cadillac's and Chevrolet's? Right now that's all that's available. Think the J-2 Oldsmobile or Twin-H Power Hudson would make an interesting stocker if the horsepower factor was realistic? Or a Y-block Ford Fairlane called "Maybelline"!
![]() Lew
__________________
Lew Silverman #2070 "The Wagon Master" N/SA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
So-after aquiring the needed parts to get my '57-150 to run m/sa with one wcfb or k/sa with the 2x4 setup is the consensus here that I'm wasting my time-money and effort on a project that cannot compete?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 22
Likes: 9
Liked 4 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
I think the 57 283 combination's are factored pretty fair. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Whittier, Ca
Posts: 830
Likes: 102
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
The 57 150 is a N/SA, O/SA and P/SA. You forgot the powerglide weight. I would use the Rochester carb not the wcfb.. It will compete very well in O/SA at 3395 pounds
__________________
Tony Janes 7941 STK, SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 385
Likes: 101
Liked 419 Times in 85 Posts
|
![]()
If I had the time. I would do a 1957 Chevrolet. I think people would be very surprised how good one would run. It is just a 50k deal but the second you rolled into the staging lanes no one would even notice a cobra jet or challenger.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 762
Likes: 16
Liked 653 Times in 89 Posts
|
![]()
Steve you can’t tell me a 1955 Chevy with 265ci and rated at 205hp can’t run mid to low thirteen’s. You only haft to scale around 3500 pounds.
Captain jacks 1960 283ci Kingswood runs 13.80s at 4400 pounds
__________________
Charley Downing 3548 STK Last edited by Charley Downing; 12-21-2011 at 03:06 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Jacksonville, Florida
Posts: 808
Likes: 7
Liked 20 Times in 12 Posts
|
![]()
The 57 150 with a 1 4bbl 283 with a T200 trans is a good combination. I would build it if I was starting from scratch and wanted a 55-57 car. I would like to see this. The bottom line on the 265 combo is NHRA has the "stock" HP listed wrong it should be the stock 180hp to start with then go from there as cars are run and prove themselves
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Dunnellon,FL
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]()
Like I said, only benefits tri-5 chevys.
It would cost $75k to $100k to fully develop my '58 Pontiac Chieftan Tri power to a competitive Stocker, same to the rest of the cars......no parts are available unlike the tri-5's which have all the parts available. JimR
__________________
Jim Rountree |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|