I Told You So!

[Alan Roehrich]

Originally Posted by Eddies66

The only side I am taking is the one that offers "liberty and justice for all"

Yeah. Hearsay evidence, from one side, little if any of it actually verified, and most of it edited.

You really like to leave out facts you don't like. Such as, when advised by the dispatcher "we don't need you to do that", you and the "Orlando Sentinel" conveniently leave out the part where Zimmerman replied "Okay". There is no evidence Zimmerman continued to follow Martin after that. None.

You conveniently, again, leave out the part where Martin was sent to stay with his father because his mother could not get him to behave. And the part where he was in trouble at school, for either theft or vandalism, or both.

No, what you want is not justice. If you wanted justice, you would not attempt to try Zimmerman and the police in the court of public opinion, with no evidence of your own, and no verified evidence at all.

[Eddies66]

Originally Posted by Alan Roehrich

Yeah. Hearsay evidence, from one side, little if any of it actually verified, and most of it edited.

You really like to leave out facts you don't like. Such as, when advised by the dispatcher "we don't need you to do that", you and the "Orlando Sentinel" conveniently leave out the part where Zimmerman replied "Okay". There is no evidence Zimmerman continued to follow Martin after that. None.

You conveniently, again, leave out the part where Martin was sent to stay with his father because his mother could not get him to behave. And the part where he was in trouble at school, for either theft or vandalism, or both.

No, what you want is not justice. If you wanted justice, you would not attempt to try Zimmerman and the police in the court of public opinion, with no evidence of your own, and no verified evidence at all.

Only Mr. Zimmerman can answer any of these questions, do I see a conviction......NOPE! I haven't spoken to Mr. Zimmerman today so I can't verify facts as you know them. Unless you are part of the investigation team, you know no more than I do about this case.

You seem to think that it is unusual for a child to be moved to the same-gender parent when they have a disciplinary problem, most schools and counselors recommend it. So what is your point? He was a disciplinary problem and not a felon.

[Alan Roehrich]

Originally Posted by Eddies66

Only Mr. Zimmerman can answer any of these questions, do I see a conviction......NOPE! I haven't spoken to Mr. Zimmerman today so I can't verify facts as you know them. Unless you are part of the investigation team, you know no more than I do about this case.

You seem to think that it is unusual for a child to be moved to the same-gender parent when they have a disciplinary problem, most schools and counselors recommend it. So what is your point? He was a disciplinary problem and not a felon.

I don't think it is all unusual. It merely brings out the point that Martin is not this angelic, lily white, pure as the driven snow, perfect young man you and others attempt to portray him as. Evidently he was smoking pot, got the munchies, went to the store for some Skittles and iced tea, and on the way back, decided to confront and assault a citizen who thought he looked suspicious and called the police. Evidently his dad wasn't doing too good a job raising the teenager since he was out smoking pot. Or maybe he was smoking pot at his dad's house.

You seem to enjoy questioning the character and credibility of Zimmerman, and you give Martin a complete pass. It's ludicrous and absurd. The bias is hilarious, albeit sad.

Your entire fantasy version of the incident ignores all fact, logic, and evidence. You tell us Martin knew Zimmerman had a gun. There's no evidence of that. You tell us Zimmerman outweighed Martin by 60 pounds, yet he ran Martin down, evidently while brandishing a gun, and confronted him. Then, poor little Martin managed to break Zimmerman's nose, bloody his nose, black both his eyes, as well cut his forehead and the back of his head. All of this he did to the big bully Zimmerman, while Zimmerman had his gun out, and only after all that did Zimmerman, who supposedly had his gun out, and his cell phone, shoot Martin. Here we have Martin, the 140 pound teenage athlete, who apparently, according to you anyway, sees the older and heavier Zimmerman, and apparently sees he has a gun. So instead of running, the unarmed Martin attacks him? Seriously?

Zimmerman is being railroaded. Under any other circumstances, had black politicians not gotten involved, the case would have been dismissed for what it is, a violent assault on a citizen which resulted in the death of the perpetrator of the assault. If the "special prosecutor" does not succeed in railroading Zimmerman, Eric Holder's minions in the Injustice Department will succeed in getting "civil rights" charges trumped up against him, and the overwhelming power of the federal government will steam roll Zimmerman.