2013 Cobra Jet Specs are up

69Cobra · 06-06-2012, 12:01 PM

Not nearly as soft as the '10-'12 combo's. Which should make everyone but the ones building the cars happy. I'm kind of glad I cancelled my order for the Competition Kit I was going to build. Which I was going to build as a '10-'12 352/285 stick combo instead of the 5.0/350 anyway. I know the new 5.0 is a bada$$ motor but to my knowledge the NA version is factored right out of the box harder cubic inch to hp than any other engine in history. Correct me if I'm wrong. I don't know if Ford is being more straight up when asking for the ratings or if NHRA is finally taking a stand? 302/350 = .86 cubic inch per hp factored. Someone please show me a NA combo that came out of the box factored this hard. To be honest all for of the combo are factored hard in my opinion.

06-06-2012, 12:01 PM	#4
69Cobra Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: California, Ky Posts: 669 Likes: 61 Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts	Re: 2013 Cobra Jet Specs are up Not nearly as soft as the '10-'12 combo's. Which should make everyone but the ones building the cars happy. I'm kind of glad I cancelled my order for the Competition Kit I was going to build. Which I was going to build as a '10-'12 352/285 stick combo instead of the 5.0/350 anyway. I know the new 5.0 is a bada$$ motor but to my knowledge the NA version is factored right out of the box harder cubic inch to hp than any other engine in history. Correct me if I'm wrong. I don't know if Ford is being more straight up when asking for the ratings or if NHRA is finally taking a stand? 302/350 = .86 cubic inch per hp factored. Someone please show me a NA combo that came out of the box factored this hard. To be honest all for of the combo are factored hard in my opinion. __________________ Kris Rachford 69 Cobra 428CJ 4 Speed C/S 3032 Last edited by 69Cobra; 06-06-2012 at 12:32 PM.