HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-10-2012, 02:34 PM   #1
69Cobra
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: California, Ky
Posts: 669
Likes: 61
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default Re: The damage recently done

If I'm thinking right. The PI intake is the same casting as the CJ intake except it is aluminum instead of cast iron. Basically the only advantage is the difference in weight between the iron and aluminum. It's not going to make any more power than the CJ intake. But I'm sure the difference in weight is worth .20
__________________
Kris Rachford
69 Cobra 428CJ 4 Speed
C/S 3032
69Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2012, 03:09 PM   #2
CycloneFE
Senior Member
 
CycloneFE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Decatur Illinois
Posts: 634
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default Re: The damage recently done

Quote:
Originally Posted by 69Cobra View Post
If I'm thinking right. The PI intake is the same casting as the CJ intake except it is aluminum instead of cast iron. Basically the only advantage is the difference in weight between the iron and aluminum. It's not going to make any more power than the CJ intake. But I'm sure the difference in weight is worth .20
Kris, you are correct. Here is some more history on the PI.

The aluminum PI intake is the same as a later-design of the 427MR intake. Early MR intakes had different throttle mount bosses and did not have the machined-in features that allowed fitting the three-fingered rocker oil control baffles used in all FEs (except the 427MR) from 1958-66, so to fit the 427MR intake to a non-427MR engine six extra cutouts at the pushrod holes needed to be machined into the aluminum intake. Note that all FEs would inherit the simpler 427MR rocker oil control baffles from 1967-76. By the time the 428PI was developed in 1966, the 427MR intake machining protocol added the extra counterbores to the intake, and also modified the throttle linkage bosses so the intake would work in both 427MR and 428PI applications. As for the penny-pinching part, the PI did not earn a special intake casting, but 1966 was the first year of both the of the Chrysler 440 and Ford 428, so it was clear some free breathing was in order. It made sense to install the MR aluminum intake onto the 428PI to keep competitive with the 440, even though the intake was not cheap to cast. It wasn't until the 428CJ was born that the accounting department saw a cost-benefit to designing a low-cost iron alternative to the MR intake, so about a month or so after the iron intake was being installed onto 428CJ engines, the 428PI engine lost the aluminum and gained the CJ iron intake, thus making the Ford a more profitable police vehicle.


Seems funny to me that in 1968 the CJ was slotted into the C/SA catagory and you will find it STILL there today. Sounds to me like there are little or no improvements other than just keeping up with the rest of the pack.
__________________
Steve Jackson
CycloneFE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2012, 03:25 PM   #3
Bart Kilraine
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Carrolltown,PA
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times in 6 Posts
Default Re: The damage recently done

1968 =335 H.P.......2012 =383 H.P.....Not quite the same weight for C/SA !
Bart Kilraine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2012, 04:12 PM   #4
Greg Hill
VIP Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Louisville , KY
Posts: 1,995
Likes: 68
Liked 279 Times in 68 Posts
Default Re: The damage recently done

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bart Kilraine View Post
1968 =335 H.P.......2012 =383 H.P.....Not quite the same weight for C/SA !
One of those over rated cj's ran 9.98 at Earlville in A/SA. Pretty impressive.
__________________
Greg Hill 4171 STK
Greg Hill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2012, 04:53 PM   #5
Chris Kilraine
Junior Member
 
Chris Kilraine's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Loretto, PA
Posts: 97
Likes: 5
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Default Re: The damage recently done

Greg, is that first 9 sec A/SA pass?.......??
Chris Kilraine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2012, 11:13 PM   #6
Geerhead55
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Tacoma, Washington
Posts: 1,632
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Wink Re: The damage recently done

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Kilraine View Post
Greg, is that first 9 sec A/SA pass?.......??
No Chris,,,, that honor goes to Bobby DeArmond,, '69 427 Camaro at Mission Raceway B.C. in May of 2001. That run is one of the highlights in the DVD "Four Days In May" that many on here have in their collections.
Danny Durham
Geerhead55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2012, 11:22 PM   #7
DonatoEng
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Milford, MI
Posts: 147
Likes: 12
Liked 8 Times in 5 Posts
Default Re: The damage recently done

Does this make all of my old AMC race parts worth a bunch of $$$$$
DonatoEng is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2012, 04:43 AM   #8
69Cobra
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: California, Ky
Posts: 669
Likes: 61
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default Re: The damage recently done

Quote:
Originally Posted by Geerhead55 View Post
No Chris,,,, that honor goes to Bobby DeArmond,, '69 427 Camaro at Mission Raceway B.C. in May of 2001. That run is one of the highlights in the DVD "Four Days In May" that many on here have in their collections.
Danny Durham
Yeah only 11 years behind... that's not bad
__________________
Kris Rachford
69 Cobra 428CJ 4 Speed
C/S 3032
69Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2012, 09:15 PM   #9
Chris Kilraine
Junior Member
 
Chris Kilraine's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Loretto, PA
Posts: 97
Likes: 5
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Default Re: The damage recently done

Quote:
Originally Posted by Geerhead55 View Post
No Chris,,,, that honor goes to Bobby DeArmond,, '69 427 Camaro at Mission Raceway B.C. in May of 2001. That run is one of the highlights in the DVD "Four Days In May" that many on here have in their collections.
Danny Durham
Yes...well aware. Pretty sure that was some sarcasim
Chris Kilraine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2012, 10:55 PM   #10
69Cobra
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: California, Ky
Posts: 669
Likes: 61
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default Re: The damage recently done

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg Hill View Post
One of those over rated cj's ran 9.98 at Earlville in A/SA. Pretty impressive.
Not really when you consider that Lance has arguably the fastest CJ in the country by a few tenths and I'm sure its got every bit of Pro Stock technology that he can use to get it there. 9.984 on an 11.00 index is only 1.016 under. Now if I could get one to run a second under then I would be impressed but you're talking about a guy who's brother is arguably the best engine builder/tuner in NHRA Pro Stock. I think this separates Lance from the rest of us.
__________________
Kris Rachford
69 Cobra 428CJ 4 Speed
C/S 3032
69Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.