|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 437
Likes: 15
Liked 18 Times in 6 Posts
|
![]()
Run everything off index heads up. Lol. Even though I like that idea costs would really skyrocket then and that's mostly everyone's biggest complaint is costs.
__________________
2014 Cobra Jet FS/XX #3345 STK/SS Like us on http://www.facebook.com/pages/Daniel...25886327426822 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Wichita Ks
Posts: 383
Likes: 71
Liked 30 Times in 17 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Newport News, VA
Posts: 1,435
Likes: 371
Liked 129 Times in 59 Posts
|
![]()
It would be nice to be able to run "heads-up" in every class. And it would be nice to be able to run against the index during eliminations. But until we figure out a way to accurately and realistically factor all the possible combinations in the Classification Guide, what's the point? How long do we have to wait for the AHFS to bring us to parity? How long would you continue to race if you continually got beat by the same combination?
If this is supposed to be a performance based eliminator, that's fine. If you can legitimately run 1-second or more under your class index without having a unfair horsepower advantage, more power to you. (Pun intended!) Lew
__________________
Lew Silverman #2070 "The Wagon Master" N/SA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|