|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NJ
Posts: 503
Likes: 130
Liked 451 Times in 77 Posts
|
![]()
Joe, yes I know that. I was hoping this thread died initially because this subject is something that needs to be settled behind closed doors with key people and not out in a public forum. I hope I'm wrong here and as I've stated, I'd rather find a solution for ALL than point fingers.
Chuck, I hope it rains down there and snows up here and the roads are impassible, LOL. I predict it could be ugly and am glad I'll be up north here!! And, FJ, I was thinking your first post was stirring the pot. I realized since that you are not involved. I meant no disrespect to you and consider your chassis skills among the greatest out there. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 6 Posts
|
![]()
Aren't the valve cover bolt holes on a Hemi to the inside of the gasket rail? Here's a picture on the following website to show what I am talking about.
http://www.dvorakmachine.com/HemiRockerStands.shtml If that is the case, then the entire gasket rail would be totally cut off on the intake side to reach the valve cover bolt holes. I can see where that would be an issue when someone building hemi heads cuts the head back far enough to remove the gasket rail and the valve cover gasket has to be seated to the intake manifold or to an added spacer. That is just flat wrong and any head modified like that should be DQ'd. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,824
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times in 12 Posts
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]()
Until I saw the picture of the position of the VC bolts I could not understand what all the fuss was about. Now I can agree with those who want the heads disqualified.
NHRA needs to enforce the rule. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,824
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times in 12 Posts
|
![]()
Just wondering, so has this issue been settled yet...
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 101
Likes: 51
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 101
Likes: 51
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Island of high taxes, N.Y.
Posts: 541
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 148
Likes: 4
Liked 10 Times in 6 Posts
|
![]()
CW posted the latest news on Moparts.559,559M,559M-1 heads will be allowed to break thru at the intake flange surface,but the hole at the top(v/c gasket surface) must remain intact and in stock location.Heads already milled into the bolt hole need to be replaced. Check his post on Moparts to be sure I got it correct.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Richmond Hill GA (and Port Ludlow WA)
Posts: 4,302
Likes: 2,398
Liked 3,202 Times in 977 Posts
|
![]()
Here's the link to the Moparts post Dana referenced....
http://board.moparts.org/ubbthreads/...0&fpart=2&vc=1
__________________
Jim Carter 2340 Super Stock 2340 SST/2340 Stock Set another place at the table |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|