|
![]() |
#421 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,818
Likes: 2,909
Liked 5,126 Times in 1,954 Posts
|
![]()
There are more opinions in this thread than in Bruce's poll..
Must be a lot of uninvolved third parties here.
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#422 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Winter Park, Florida
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
X_TECH MAN is totally correct. We saved enough money to purchase a second home. Thanks NHRA, I never realized how much you cared..... Jim
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#423 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: California, Ky
Posts: 669
Likes: 61
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]()
Ed I don't see a 351 or an engine factored at 312hp in the '13 options.
__________________
Kris Rachford 69 Cobra 428CJ 4 Speed C/S 3032 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#424 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 701
Likes: 446
Liked 174 Times in 39 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
The 427 COPO would be closer around 460 I'd say, and the 428/427 CJ around 440-450. The 2010 352 CJ should be around 400, as should the 2012 363 (comparing it to the 5.7L hemi which still qualifies at the top). The 2010 281 CJ should probably be 310-315 or so, and the 2012 302 maybe 360-370. I'd put the 2013 302 CJ around 410-415. The 5.7L and 6.1L DPs seem to be rated pretty fair now (421 and 440), the 6.4 probably needs another 20 or so to be rated similar to the 6.1, and the 5.9 should be around 375. These are just my estimations as to what I think would be a lot closer, some still might be a little too soft, some maybe a little too hard. It's also difficult to compare when you get to the higher classes because the indexes as you move from A->CC->BB etc get so much tougher.
__________________
3207 D/SA, C/ED |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#425 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 761
Likes: 16
Liked 633 Times in 88 Posts
|
![]()
Yea Andie my 281 motor rated at 315hp while the 1991 350 corvette is rated at 260hp(with a stick). That's real fair. The 281 in STK (with a current HP rating of around 260HP) is within 15 HP of where it needs to be(275-280).
If my motor is 50 HP soft, then your combo is 25 HP soft. If your dad and others( bruce) hate NHRA so much why do you guys still race with them? No one is make you guys pay your memberships. Like it was posted earlier, take 2013 off and see if NHRA cares. But I can bet they could not give a **$$ if 50 or so of you take this year off.
__________________
Charley Downing 3548 STK Last edited by Charley Downing; 12-16-2012 at 07:00 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#426 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 701
Likes: 446
Liked 174 Times in 39 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Do you not think your motor can make close to 1.75 hp per cubic inch? Quote:
__________________
3207 D/SA, C/ED Last edited by Andrew Hill; 12-16-2012 at 07:05 PM. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#427 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 761
Likes: 16
Liked 633 Times in 88 Posts
|
![]()
No Andie , between 442-453 is all HP we could get out of the new motor at big stuffs two weeks ago. With good pistons .70 over, killer stocker ring package and a new set of killer heads. And one of the best tuners in the country. No matter how good of parts we have we still only have 281CI to work with.
There is not that much to gain with this new stuff. The factory part are really good. We spent over 14 grand on the new motor with all kinds od stocker tricks and picked up 12-15 HP over the old mostly stock stuff wich made 440 HP. I might be able to make 490-500 HP with a SS intake, SS pistons, SS heads and a few other SS things, but I still think 480-490 HP is around the max for a SS motor. If you dad likes coming just to hang out he should be more like Bob and not care what the new cars are doing. Just where to eat.
__________________
Charley Downing 3548 STK Last edited by Charley Downing; 12-16-2012 at 07:21 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#428 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 701
Likes: 446
Liked 174 Times in 39 Posts
|
![]()
The main problem I have with the bogus HP factors is that the performance aspect of class racing is already going by the wayside, and that is the only thing that separates stock and superstock from normal bracket racing. I like bracket racing, but heads ups and class are what make stock/ss the absolute best.
Imagine this: D/SA at Indy including myself, Randi Lynn Shipp, Bryan Phillips, Brad VanLant, Adam Davis, Tommy Gaynor, Leo Glasbrenner, Paul Boster, Vic Guilmino, and I'm sure there are some other really fast cars I'm forgetting. 350 Chevys, 400 Pontiacs, 340 Chryslers, LS1, 396 Chevy, maybe throw in a fast LT1. Talk about a bad *** class race. Then imagine one 352 Ford that's been prepared well and will run about .4 faster than any car on that list. Now everyone's racing for second place.
__________________
3207 D/SA, C/ED |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#429 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Shelbyville, KY
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]() Quote:
Conway |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#430 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 761
Likes: 16
Liked 633 Times in 88 Posts
|
![]()
Andie, who won C/SA and D/SA at Indy this year?
Conway lets not give NHRA any ideas. Beside that would be bad for you and JT. You guys would have way less customers if STK or SS went away.
__________________
Charley Downing 3548 STK Last edited by Charley Downing; 12-16-2012 at 07:29 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|