HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-16-2012, 02:20 PM   #421
Mark Yacavone
Veteran Member
 
Mark Yacavone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,818
Likes: 2,909
Liked 5,126 Times in 1,954 Posts
Default Re: GM Releases 2013 bogus HP ratings at PRI show

There are more opinions in this thread than in Bruce's poll..

Must be a lot of uninvolved third parties here.
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers
Mark Yacavone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2012, 02:33 PM   #422
Jim Fitzpatrick
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Winter Park, Florida
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: GM Releases 2013 bogus HP ratings at PRI show

X_TECH MAN is totally correct. We saved enough money to purchase a second home. Thanks NHRA, I never realized how much you cared..... Jim
Jim Fitzpatrick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2012, 03:12 PM   #423
69Cobra
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: California, Ky
Posts: 669
Likes: 61
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default Re: GM Releases 2013 bogus HP ratings at PRI show

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed Wright View Post
Hope your not including the 351" crate engine in that. 312 HP?
Ed I don't see a 351 or an engine factored at 312hp in the '13 options.
__________________
Kris Rachford
69 Cobra 428CJ 4 Speed
C/S 3032
69Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2012, 06:44 PM   #424
Andrew Hill
Senior Member
 
Andrew Hill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 701
Likes: 446
Liked 174 Times in 39 Posts
Default Re: GM Releases 2013 bogus HP ratings at PRI show

Quote:
Originally Posted by D.Johns View Post
That was actually a serious question. What do people believe is a fair and honest rating for my car? 450-475-500-525-550-575-600-800?

What abou the other combos? What is a fair and honest rating in the eyes of the peers? What would you have rated them at if you were putting them in the guide? Again not talking class just HP?
As far as the supercharged cars go, I'd say 500 is about right for the smaller blower cars. The ones like yours and the COPO with the 2.9L blower maybe 20-30 more, I'm not sure how much better it is.

The 427 COPO would be closer around 460 I'd say, and the 428/427 CJ around 440-450. The 2010 352 CJ should be around 400, as should the 2012 363 (comparing it to the 5.7L hemi which still qualifies at the top). The 2010 281 CJ should probably be 310-315 or so, and the 2012 302 maybe 360-370. I'd put the 2013 302 CJ around 410-415.

The 5.7L and 6.1L DPs seem to be rated pretty fair now (421 and 440), the 6.4 probably needs another 20 or so to be rated similar to the 6.1, and the 5.9 should be around 375.

These are just my estimations as to what I think would be a lot closer, some still might be a little too soft, some maybe a little too hard. It's also difficult to compare when you get to the higher classes because the indexes as you move from A->CC->BB etc get so much tougher.
__________________
3207 D/SA, C/ED
Andrew Hill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2012, 06:50 PM   #425
Charley Downing
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 761
Likes: 16
Liked 633 Times in 88 Posts
Default Re: GM Releases 2013 bogus HP ratings at PRI show

Yea Andie my 281 motor rated at 315hp while the 1991 350 corvette is rated at 260hp(with a stick). That's real fair. The 281 in STK (with a current HP rating of around 260HP) is within 15 HP of where it needs to be(275-280).
If my motor is 50 HP soft, then your combo is 25 HP soft.

If your dad and others( bruce) hate NHRA so much why do you guys still race with them? No one is make you guys pay your memberships. Like it was posted earlier, take 2013 off and see if NHRA cares. But I can bet they could not give a **$$ if 50 or so of you take this year off.
__________________
Charley Downing 3548 STK

Last edited by Charley Downing; 12-16-2012 at 07:00 PM.
Charley Downing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2012, 06:55 PM   #426
Andrew Hill
Senior Member
 
Andrew Hill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 701
Likes: 446
Liked 174 Times in 39 Posts
Default Re: GM Releases 2013 bogus HP ratings at PRI show

Quote:
Originally Posted by Charley Downing View Post
Yea Andie my 281 motor rated at 315hp while the 1991 350 corvette is rated at 260hp(with a stick). That's real fair.
That one's soft as hell too, but if we're talking sticks, the 5.7 Hemi at 305 takes the cake. If I'm not mistaken, that 350 Corvette has a terrible intake, it would be an even better superstock combination.

Do you not think your motor can make close to 1.75 hp per cubic inch?

Quote:
If your dad and others( bruce) hate NHRA so much why do you guys still race with them? No one is make you guys pay your memberships. Like it was posted earlier, take 2013 off and see if NHRA cares. But I can bet they could not give a **$$ if 50 or so of you take this year off.
If I wasn't racing he probably wouldn't. I think he likes the beer drinking aspect the most anyways.
__________________
3207 D/SA, C/ED

Last edited by Andrew Hill; 12-16-2012 at 07:05 PM.
Andrew Hill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2012, 07:14 PM   #427
Charley Downing
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 761
Likes: 16
Liked 633 Times in 88 Posts
Default Re: GM Releases 2013 bogus HP ratings at PRI show

No Andie , between 442-453 is all HP we could get out of the new motor at big stuffs two weeks ago. With good pistons .70 over, killer stocker ring package and a new set of killer heads. And one of the best tuners in the country. No matter how good of parts we have we still only have 281CI to work with.
There is not that much to gain with this new stuff. The factory part are really good. We spent over 14 grand on the new motor with all kinds od stocker tricks and picked up 12-15 HP over the old mostly stock stuff wich made 440 HP.
I might be able to make 490-500 HP with a SS intake, SS pistons, SS heads and a few other SS things, but I still think 480-490 HP is around the max for a SS motor.

If you dad likes coming just to hang out he should be more like Bob and not care what the new cars are doing. Just where to eat.
__________________
Charley Downing 3548 STK

Last edited by Charley Downing; 12-16-2012 at 07:21 PM.
Charley Downing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2012, 07:20 PM   #428
Andrew Hill
Senior Member
 
Andrew Hill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 701
Likes: 446
Liked 174 Times in 39 Posts
Default Re: GM Releases 2013 bogus HP ratings at PRI show

The main problem I have with the bogus HP factors is that the performance aspect of class racing is already going by the wayside, and that is the only thing that separates stock and superstock from normal bracket racing. I like bracket racing, but heads ups and class are what make stock/ss the absolute best.

Imagine this: D/SA at Indy including myself, Randi Lynn Shipp, Bryan Phillips, Brad VanLant, Adam Davis, Tommy Gaynor, Leo Glasbrenner, Paul Boster, Vic Guilmino, and I'm sure there are some other really fast cars I'm forgetting. 350 Chevys, 400 Pontiacs, 340 Chryslers, LS1, 396 Chevy, maybe throw in a fast LT1. Talk about a bad *** class race. Then imagine one 352 Ford that's been prepared well and will run about .4 faster than any car on that list. Now everyone's racing for second place.
__________________
3207 D/SA, C/ED
Andrew Hill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2012, 07:24 PM   #429
Conway Witten
Member
 
Conway Witten's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Shelbyville, KY
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Question Re: GM Releases 2013 bogus HP ratings at PRI show

Quote:
Originally Posted by X-TECH MAN View Post
I have said it before but it does no good. You guys with the older cars do not listen. Take 2013 off. Just race your local circuit races and work on your equipment. Stay close to home and save a ton of money for the next year. The ONLY way NHRA will listen is if you hit them in their wallets. It will take a 100% effort on each of you. They dont care about you any other way other than your dollars. Let the rich guys have at it with their new super cars. Maybe the AHFS will work quicker. Sooner or later NHRA will see what is going on. If not.....What have you lost ? Not much from what I see. Either that or keep taking it up your shorts !
Could this be away for NHRA to deal with pain in the butt class racers and do away with stock all together the go all super gas type classes? All class racers think super gas type cars are weak? But they are simple to tech will pay their entries and never cry. Just a thought?
Conway
Conway Witten is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2012, 07:25 PM   #430
Charley Downing
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 761
Likes: 16
Liked 633 Times in 88 Posts
Default Re: GM Releases 2013 bogus HP ratings at PRI show

Andie, who won C/SA and D/SA at Indy this year?

Conway lets not give NHRA any ideas. Beside that would be bad for you and JT. You guys would have way less customers if STK or SS went away.
__________________
Charley Downing 3548 STK

Last edited by Charley Downing; 12-16-2012 at 07:29 PM.
Charley Downing is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.