|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Div. 6, Eastern, WA
Posts: 710
Likes: 2,671
Liked 240 Times in 112 Posts
|
![]()
Jim, welcome. I've got one of these Ford 2V combo's myself but mine is a 351C. I got some very expeirienced advice that believes mine to be a combo quite capable of running under. There was a small block 2V Maverick here in div. 6. That could run under, although barely,can't remember the name but I raced someone from that family @ the bracket finals one year. Good luck.
__________________
Dave Noll, EF/S ,?/SA 6526 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: southern illinois
Posts: 49
Likes: 9
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
The 68 289 is at 195 hp and the 302 is 210. To be competitive the 289 needs to be around 155. It wouldn't hurt to petition nhra for a hp reduction. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Marysville, WA
Posts: 90
Likes: 1
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
So then would the '66 289 2V in a Fairlane be within the same guidelines for an HP reduction petition?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Maryland USA
Posts: 533
Likes: 129
Liked 248 Times in 89 Posts
|
![]()
Good luck with your build. I had a similar car, a 1969 Torino GT 390, with the same roof line. Unfortunately, I crashed it driving to a race back in '79 or '80.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,496
Likes: 3,600
Liked 7,756 Times in 1,741 Posts
|
![]()
68 289s and 302s use same size carb as 71-72 Comets and need HP help. 66 289 uses bigger carb. It still needs help, just not as much.
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm not spending 100K to win 2K |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|