|
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
I have a s/st---s/g 1967 camaro . Stock sub frame [ front ] bbc alum heads. fiberglass hood, fenders, doors , and all plastic windows and alum tin work. Here's my question ? I'm thinking about getting the QA1 front '' race '' coil-overs. Would this be a good or bad move ? I would buy the good A-arms as well. '' tube style '' ....The car is a ladder bar car. Run about 9.20's -9.30 off the stop. If anybody has any info on these,PLEASE let know. Thanks.....Mitch
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Allentown,PA
Posts: 2,468
Likes: 875
Liked 838 Times in 232 Posts
|
![]()
If you are limiting the travel now ,and don't need a whole lot of travel the coil over set up is OK .
Just make sure to install limiters keep from topping out the shock. If your car likes travel use an adjustable shock with long travel like an AFCO big nose type or the QA1's with the stock type spring. The tube arms are a good choice ,you can use the shorter arms if you need to narrow the track width a little. Heres a photo of Frank Grillos Camaro with tube arms and stock type springs. 2900# ladder bar car with similar HP and ET's. The tube arms really helped the front end geometry ,along with a rack conversion.
__________________
Tom Goldman 1500 SG , 1506 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Thanks Tom, I was waiting to see if you might get on here ! I know you help alot of racers out on questions . I thank you for that.. I'm aware of the shocks , and the travel they will need. My car doesn't need alot of travel .So I think I will be okay there. I'm leaning more to the tube a-arms ,more then the shocks.The car works good now,just trying to clean up the front area. I didn't know if I had to go with both ,or just the a-arms alone. Thanks for your help.... and thanks for showing the picture..Mitch.........
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: PRESTON,CONN.
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Hi Mitch, Frank Grillo here, do what Tom says he knows his stuff. He set my car up an right out of trailer it handle like a new caddy. Couldn't be happier. Good luck Frank
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Chillicothe, OH
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Hey Mitch,
I have been looking to do the same to my Nova, I was planning on going w/ just the control arms and steering rack conversion. mainly to lighten up the nose of the car and eliminate the 1971 metal. I figure since I limit the suspension travel to a minimum, I'd keep "stock style prings". I would like to narrow the track width as well. You'll have to let me know what you decide to do and how it works out. See ya at the races. Kevin |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 308
Likes: 5
Liked 17 Times in 13 Posts
|
![]()
Tom,
I too am looking to upgrade my front suspension this year. Frank showed me his set up and it really looked great along with his praise of the difference. I have a 70’ Camaro 10.90 and bracket car. When I 10.90 race, I limit the travel which is not a problem however when I bracket race all out, the car likes and needs the front end to come up and get the weight on the back tires. I currently use a tall 18” stock style springs ( a real bitch to install) with lots of stored energy and a respectable ride height and I use a Koni single adjustable SPA1 shock. I have ordered the tubular pro A-arms. I held off on the rack because it appears the only advantage for me would be weight and that is really not an issue at this time vs the work to install. Car weighs 2850, SBC and my fat azz. I would like to upgrade the shocks so I can adjust without taking them out of the car. As you most likely know the Koni requires removal to adjust. I was leaning toward the Strange single adjustable for stock spring set up. You mention some others. If you don’t mind what shock did you put in Franks car and do you have a recommendation? Thanks in advance for your help
__________________
Drew Wonderly SST 159 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: PRESTON,CONN.
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Hey Drew, I have Strange single adjustable- # S5267. Just turn the knob and your done,had the same Konies they work but were hassel to change. Frank
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 308
Likes: 5
Liked 17 Times in 13 Posts
|
![]()
Hey Frank,
Happy New Year to you and family. Thanks for the info. That is one of the shocks I am concidering. Sounds like I may be in the right direction.
__________________
Drew Wonderly SST 159 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: PRESTON,CONN.
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Happy New Year to you and yours Drew, You might want to give Lynns husband Tom a call at S&W racecars. I beleave they are having a sale on shocks this month,Good luck Frank
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Allentown,PA
Posts: 2,468
Likes: 875
Liked 838 Times in 232 Posts
|
![]()
Drew ,the Strange singles will be fine on your car.
The big advantage of the rack is the elimination of bump steer. this is not a huge problem on a car with stock suspension and limited travel, however it is an issue when allowing full travel. You can correct the worst of the bump steer with a stock box by using heim ends and spacers to eliminate the stock tie rod ends.
__________________
Tom Goldman 1500 SG , 1506 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|