|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Liked 27 Times in 14 Posts
|
![]()
Jason, if you have no dog in this hunt, take a hike.
The spherical bearings in question were allowed 10 years ago with no issues. Now out of nowhere, someone decided they didnt like what they saw. How do I know? WE GOT THEM OK'd in Vegas 2003. I would not call that stretching the rules. I was there when it was fine to use the stuff in question, and I was there when they didnt like what they saw on a mopar this past July. What I do know, is on a Ford, the way the replacement parts work, it does not allow the lower control arms to flex and will keep them in check, without damaging the frame horns of the suspension after an over violent wheelstand, repetitive wheelstands, or any braking. There is absolutely NO performance advantage to this stuff. It makes the car more stable at speed, and controlable when the car lands the front end. Period. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: California, Ky
Posts: 669
Likes: 61
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]()
Well I asked if they could explain how this is a safety issue in SS but not Stock and here's the reply.
Quote:
__________________
Kris Rachford 69 Cobra 428CJ 4 Speed C/S 3032 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Spokane Valley, WA
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]()
Still didnt answer your question, did he...?
__________________
Phil Hudlow 6678 (S/C, S/G, ET-PRO) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Michigan City IN
Posts: 633
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
pretty much the same answer we got. And i went ahead and asked the magic question what ever happened to " dedicated to safety"?
__________________
Alex Denysenko NHRA 3038 SS, 3305 STK - IHRA 6 SS, 330A STK Moneymaker Racing LaPorte Indiana 219-861-1214 www.moneymakerracing.net |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: California, Ky
Posts: 669
Likes: 61
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Kris Rachford 69 Cobra 428CJ 4 Speed C/S 3032 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Lacombe, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Liked 64 Times in 11 Posts
|
![]()
Safety & Strut rod conversation with Bruce @ NHRA
I talked to Bruce today regarding the safety issues with stock strut rods, deflecting and causing the front wheels to skid on cars like my '64 Thunderbolt, they feel that it's OK to have safe Super-stock cars but not stock eliminator!???! Please take the time ASAP to e-mail NHRA's tech department with your safety concerns regarding the use of aftermarket strut rods to control the unsafe movement, during wheel stands and braking! There is no performance advantage here......strictly safety. Tom Nolan A/SA 6015 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: California, Ky
Posts: 669
Likes: 61
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Kris Rachford 69 Cobra 428CJ 4 Speed C/S 3032 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Live Reporter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hickory, Ky
Posts: 10,648
Likes: 1,941
Liked 10,756 Times in 2,236 Posts
|
![]()
Tom Nolan, thanks for your work on this.
Larry |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
So it is in writing that this modification to Stock frontend suspension parts was okayed 10 years ago? Not a problem. I'm sure showing that letter to the tech dept will put an end to all the controversy. Thanks for letting everyone know that you have the answer. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: California, Ky
Posts: 669
Likes: 61
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Since you are so smart and this is your fight can you tell me what NHRA's logic is for correcting a safety issue in one class but not the other when there is absolutely zero performance advantage here and like I said earlier some of these Stockers weight more and are faster than a comparable SS'r. Please tell me how that makes sense. Matter of fact if my info is correct and I understand it correctly there has already been an on track incident related to the rubber bushings in the front suspension on a Mopar that took out about 4 or 5 sections of guardrail out at Mason Dixon in 2007 at a division 1 race. In case you haven't noticed Jason there has been over 22,000 views on this topic. I think its important to 99% of Stock and SS racers for one reason or another. Now that SS racers are in the clear and not sh!ting their pants anymore as far as the ruling in their class we probably wont hear from them anymore on this. But I can promise you if NHRA wasn't passing this for SS there would be more people than me and the few others here wanting answers. You've got million dollar cars going down at 130mph with OEM rubber strut rod bushings. Make sense to you Jason?
__________________
Kris Rachford 69 Cobra 428CJ 4 Speed C/S 3032 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|