HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-21-2013, 04:16 PM   #1
Capri
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Liked 27 Times in 14 Posts
Default Re: Suspension Notice for S/SS by NHRA

Jason, if you have no dog in this hunt, take a hike.

The spherical bearings in question were allowed 10 years ago with no issues. Now out of nowhere, someone decided they didnt like what they saw. How do I know? WE GOT THEM OK'd in Vegas 2003. I would not call that stretching the rules.

I was there when it was fine to use the stuff in question, and I was there when they didnt like what they saw on a mopar this past July.

What I do know, is on a Ford, the way the replacement parts work, it does not allow the lower control arms to flex and will keep them in check, without damaging the frame horns of the suspension after an over violent wheelstand, repetitive wheelstands, or any braking. There is absolutely NO performance advantage to this stuff. It makes the car more stable at speed, and controlable when the car lands the front end. Period.
Capri is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2013, 11:58 AM   #2
69Cobra
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: California, Ky
Posts: 669
Likes: 61
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default Re: Suspension Notice for S/SS by NHRA

Well I asked if they could explain how this is a safety issue in SS but not Stock and here's the reply.


Quote:
Kris,

Super Stock can use the spherical bearings / rod ends, just like they are allowed to use a 14 ½ inch tire or a four link, or ported cylinder heads, or a sheet metal intake manifold, etc. As mentioned in my previous reply the decision has been made; should our position change in the future, that change would be reflected in the then current NHRA Rulebook or amendments thereto.

Pat Cvengros

Pacific Division Technical Director

(626) 250-2295

Are you an NHRA member yet? JOIN NOW!

For further NHRA Racer information please visit www.NHRARacer.com
__________________
Kris Rachford
69 Cobra 428CJ 4 Speed
C/S 3032
69Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2013, 12:13 PM   #3
Hudlow66
Junior Member
 
Hudlow66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Spokane Valley, WA
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: Suspension Notice for S/SS by NHRA

Still didnt answer your question, did he...?
__________________
Phil Hudlow 6678 (S/C, S/G, ET-PRO)
Hudlow66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2013, 02:58 AM   #4
Alex Denysenko
Senior Member
 
Alex Denysenko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Michigan City IN
Posts: 633
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: Suspension Notice for S/SS by NHRA

Quote:
Originally Posted by 69cobra View Post
well i asked if they could explain how this is a safety issue in ss but not stock and here's the reply.
pretty much the same answer we got. And i went ahead and asked the magic question what ever happened to " dedicated to safety"?
__________________
Alex Denysenko NHRA 3038 SS, 3305 STK - IHRA 6 SS, 330A STK
Moneymaker Racing LaPorte Indiana 219-861-1214
www.moneymakerracing.net
Alex Denysenko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2013, 01:57 PM   #5
69Cobra
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: California, Ky
Posts: 669
Likes: 61
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default Re: Suspension Notice for S/SS by NHRA

Quote:
4:1 ALIGNMENT
Each car in competition, regardless of class, must have sufficient positive front-end alignment to ensure proper handling of car at all speeds.
Right out of the rule book! Kind of hard to keep a positive alignment when the brake strut rod's rubber bushings are letting everything move around.
__________________
Kris Rachford
69 Cobra 428CJ 4 Speed
C/S 3032
69Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2013, 07:06 PM   #6
Tom Nolan
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Lacombe, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Liked 64 Times in 11 Posts
Exclamation Re: Suspension Notice for S/SS by NHRA

Safety & Strut rod conversation with Bruce @ NHRA
I talked to Bruce today regarding the safety issues with stock strut rods, deflecting and causing the front wheels to skid on cars like my '64 Thunderbolt, they feel that it's OK to have safe Super-stock cars but not stock eliminator!???! Please take the time ASAP to e-mail NHRA's tech department with your safety concerns regarding the use of aftermarket strut rods to control the unsafe movement, during wheel stands and braking! There is no performance advantage here......strictly safety. Tom Nolan A/SA 6015
Tom Nolan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2013, 03:12 AM   #7
69Cobra
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: California, Ky
Posts: 669
Likes: 61
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default Re: Suspension Notice for S/SS by NHRA

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Nolan View Post
Safety & Strut rod conversation with Bruce @ NHRA
I talked to Bruce today regarding the safety issues with stock strut rods, deflecting and causing the front wheels to skid on cars like my '64 Thunderbolt, they feel that it's OK to have safe Super-stock cars but not stock eliminator!???! Please take the time ASAP to e-mail NHRA's tech department with your safety concerns regarding the use of aftermarket strut rods to control the unsafe movement, during wheel stands and braking! There is no performance advantage here......strictly safety. Tom Nolan A/SA 6015
Unfortunately, it seems that the safety of the racers is not their concern nor the investment we have in our race cars. Very sad state of affairs NHRA.
__________________
Kris Rachford
69 Cobra 428CJ 4 Speed
C/S 3032
69Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2013, 10:06 AM   #8
Larry Hill
Live Reporter
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hickory, Ky
Posts: 10,648
Likes: 1,941
Liked 10,756 Times in 2,236 Posts
Default Re: Suspension Notice for S/SS by NHRA

Tom Nolan, thanks for your work on this.

Larry
__________________
IHM Used Parts
https://ihmusedparts.com
888-821-1817
Larry Hill is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2013, 01:13 PM   #9
Jason
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
Default Re: Suspension Notice for S/SS by NHRA

Quote:
Originally Posted by Capri View Post
Jason, if you have no dog in this hunt, take a hike.

The spherical bearings in question were allowed 10 years ago with no issues. Now out of nowhere, someone decided they didnt like what they saw. How do I know? WE GOT THEM OK'd in Vegas 2003. I would not call that stretching the rules.

I was there when it was fine to use the stuff in question, and I was there when they didnt like what they saw on a mopar this past July.

What I do know, is on a Ford, the way the replacement parts work, it does not allow the lower control arms to flex and will keep them in check, without damaging the frame horns of the suspension after an over violent wheelstand, repetitive wheelstands, or any braking. There is absolutely NO performance advantage to this stuff. It makes the car more stable at speed, and controlable when the car lands the front end. Period.
My dog can hunt wherever and whenever I want it to!!!!!!!

So it is in writing that this modification to Stock frontend suspension parts was okayed 10 years ago? Not a problem. I'm sure showing that letter to the tech dept will put an end to all the controversy. Thanks for letting everyone know that you have the answer.
Jason is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2013, 02:38 PM   #10
69Cobra
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: California, Ky
Posts: 669
Likes: 61
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default Re: Suspension Notice for S/SS by NHRA

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason View Post
My dog can hunt wherever and whenever I want it to!!!!!!!

So it is in writing that this modification to Stock frontend suspension parts was okayed 10 years ago? Not a problem. I'm sure showing that letter to the tech dept will put an end to all the controversy. Thanks for letting everyone know that you have the answer.
Hey Tough Guy,
Since you are so smart and this is your fight can you tell me what NHRA's logic is for correcting a safety issue in one class but not the other when there is absolutely zero performance advantage here and like I said earlier some of these Stockers weight more and are faster than a comparable SS'r. Please tell me how that makes sense. Matter of fact if my info is correct and I understand it correctly there has already been an on track incident related to the rubber bushings in the front suspension on a Mopar that took out about 4 or 5 sections of guardrail out at Mason Dixon in 2007 at a division 1 race. In case you haven't noticed Jason there has been over 22,000 views on this topic. I think its important to 99% of Stock and SS racers for one reason or another. Now that SS racers are in the clear and not sh!ting their pants anymore as far as the ruling in their class we probably wont hear from them anymore on this. But I can promise you if NHRA wasn't passing this for SS there would be more people than me and the few others here wanting answers. You've got million dollar cars going down at 130mph with OEM rubber strut rod bushings. Make sense to you Jason?
__________________
Kris Rachford
69 Cobra 428CJ 4 Speed
C/S 3032
69Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.