HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-11-2013, 01:16 PM   #1
novassdude
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: usa
Posts: 752
Likes: 204
Liked 136 Times in 49 Posts
Default Re: Average year for the 10 @ LORDS2-2

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joseph Teuton View Post
I know how a lot of people do not like having the "NEW" racecars in stock but last weekend the average year for the top 10 qualifiers was 1991. Now yes, some of us will not think thats "old" but to a bunch of us in racing years that is "old".

So I guess my question is, I guess is, Is it that yall dont like the cars because they are extremely fast, yet only 5 of them were in the top ten? And the winner of the race was in a 2001 and runner up was 1980.

Im not really sure why everyone hates these cars in stock. The are sold as factory race cars for stock and super stock.

Guys cant we all just get along!! LOL
The problem I have is they changed the rules to get them in. If they would allow the real showroom cars with the real showroom engine. Just like was done for 40 years I would be fine with them.
novassdude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2013, 04:17 PM   #2
Mark Lewis
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 348
Likes: 63
Liked 207 Times in 44 Posts
Default Re: Average year for the 10 @ LORDS2-2

I don't like them because I can't afford one.
Mark Lewis is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.