HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock Tech
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-05-2013, 11:15 PM   #11
Mark Yacavone
Veteran Member
 
Mark Yacavone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,809
Likes: 2,900
Liked 5,114 Times in 1,948 Posts
Default Re: 327/300 carb CFM

4 GC is 245...
AFB is 260 in a 65 Chevelle ..

Might be fun with a T200 ..but it's a lot cheaper to find out on a dyno...in the long run.
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers
Mark Yacavone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2013, 09:33 AM   #12
Reed Granrt
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Murfreesboro, Tn
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: 327/300 carb CFM

Going in memory, the 327 with 250 hp had the 283 cylinder heads with a 1.75 int valve and a 1.5 exh ,small intake with a 4GC car and small exhaust pipe. The 300hp had the double hump heads with 1.94 intake valve with 1.5 exh with a larger intake manifold with the AFB with larger exhaust manifold. I started going thru some dyno sheets where I pulled the 250 intake and carb and installed a AFB and int. I think we picked up some hp but the heads were a restriction. Some of you guys will probably remember more than I do
reed
Reed Granrt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2013, 10:05 AM   #13
ss wannabee
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 663
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Default Re: 327/300 carb CFM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg Reimer 7376 View Post
That carb wasn't the only difference between the 62-65 250 and 300 horse 327. A good question was brought up, but I'd like to know what the CFM rating of the 4 Jet carb that the 220 and 250 horse small blocks was. The intake difference was notable, and the 461 head as opposed to the 520 head was another factor. Is the factored horsepower really that great a difference?
Not sure on the AFB carb...but checked into the 4GC's cfm rating many years ago...

Think I found about 475 cfm for the smaller early carb..(circa '57-'60?)...

Thought that the later carb was about 525...on the 220 and 250 hp engines...

Think there's one other 4GC as well...but that doesn't apply here....

Talking Chevrolet ONLY here...other GM's might be different....
ss wannabee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2013, 10:51 AM   #14
tony5022
Junior Member
 
tony5022's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 29
Likes: 8
Liked 10 Times in 2 Posts
Default Re: 327/300 carb CFM

My Corvette is able to run both combinations and we found that the AFB is 2 tenths faster than our WCFB with the right tune up. No dyno time just track tested.
Tony Hernandez
tony5022 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2013, 11:52 AM   #15
FED 387
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,416
Likes: 522
Liked 330 Times in 178 Posts
Default Re: 327/300 carb CFM

Not sure of the carb specs that is being used with that particular combo but the smallest AFB is rated @400 CFM and they go up in size to 750 CFM while a WCFB is kinda rated @ 385 CFM for the smallest ones--- Found this a long time ago not sure how accurate it still is

AFB Carbs
CFM Venturi Diameter Bore Diameter
Primary Secondary Primary Secondary

400 1 1/8 1 1/4 1 7/16 1 7/16

500 1 3/16 1 1/4 1 7/16 1 11/16

575 1 1/4 1 9/16 1 9/16 1 11/16

625 1 3/16 1 9/16 1 7/16 1 11/16

750 1 7/16 1 9/16 1 11/16 1 11/16

ALL AVS CARBS

Primary & Secondary same size 750 CFM
Primary & Secondary different size 630 CFM

4GC CARBS

CFM Venturi Diameter Bore Diameter
Primary Secondary Primary Secondary

486 1 1/8 1 1/4 1 7/16 1 7/16

553 1 1/8 1 15/32 1 7/16 1 11/16

692 1 1/8 1 15/32 1 9/16 1 11/16
FED 387 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2013, 04:25 PM   #16
Dwight Southerland
VIP Member
 
Dwight Southerland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arkansas - In the middle of everything.
Posts: 1,999
Likes: 64
Liked 772 Times in 192 Posts
Default Re: 327/300 carb CFM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reed Granrt View Post
Going in memory, the 327 with 250 hp had the 283 cylinder heads with a 1.75 int valve and a 1.5 exh ,small intake with a 4GC car and small exhaust pipe. The 300hp had the double hump heads with 1.94 intake valve with 1.5 exh with a larger intake manifold with the AFB with larger exhaust manifold.
Except '65; the 327-250 used the same heads as the 327-300 in 1965. Been that way as long as I remember.
Dwight Southerland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2013, 05:15 PM   #17
Dan Fahey
VIP Member
 
Dan Fahey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 1,084
Liked 184 Times in 113 Posts
Default Re: 327/300 carb CFM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dwight Southerland View Post
Except '65; the 327-250 used the same heads as the 327-300 in 1965. Been that way as long as I remember.
That is correct..
In 64 and 65 the 327 were both rated at 250hp.

D
Dan Fahey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2013, 08:58 AM   #18
Dan Lattimore
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Beaverdam, Va./ Port St. Lucie,Fla.
Posts: 362
Likes: 177
Liked 154 Times in 37 Posts
Smile Re: 327/300 carb CFM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Yacavone View Post
Anybody know the CFM rating on that (AFB) carb ?
Mark, Cupp has answers to all those questions. Dyno comparisons, on track back to back, every trans. and rear gear combination you can think of. We have MIR again on Monday and he will be beating the tar out of the green bean again. ------ I'm going to quit parking beside him----------Danny
__________________
66W30POST
Dan Lattimore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2013, 10:31 PM   #19
Greg Reimer 7376
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Glendora,Calif.
Posts: 1,135
Likes: 172
Liked 704 Times in 218 Posts
Cool Re: 327/300 carb CFM

Seems to me that the 409 340 horse engine of 1963-65 had a BIG 4 jet on it. 394 Olds motors and the big Buicks got it as well. Heard of a fellow putting one on a 283-220 horse and getting a BIG quantum jump in horsepower with it. I had a 65 Impala SS convertible with a 409 340 horse and a 4 speed, but I ran an AFB on it,since they were easier to maintain. That car was a real road monster with the 3.31 gears, and it would tow about anything. Nothing like torque.
Greg Reimer 7376 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.