|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
It is about NHRA-approved.
My feelings are clear on this whole deal: If we have to tether headers collectors which evidently are flying off at an alarming rate (never seen it in 25 years of racing and 15 years owning tracks) they BETTER be adding - Wheel tethers, steering wheel tethers, lug nut tethers, Fuel cell tethers, battery tethers, hood and hood scoop tethers rear end housing tethers, WHERE would the TETHER RULE END? or should it ever end? Never have I seen a more stupid rule. Jok |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Spokane Valley, WA
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]()
Thank you SSDiv6
__________________
Phil Hudlow 6678 (S/C, S/G, ET-PRO) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Anthem, Arizona
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
Chevy 620,
I wonder if a weld on ladder bar system on a stock Eliminator car (heck, maybe even a 4-link) would be considered a tether system for the rear end?
__________________
Jeff Lee 7494 D/S '70 AMX |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 313
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Dale Posnick |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 3,043
Likes: 712
Liked 1,577 Times in 581 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|