09-30-2013, 03:38 PM
|
#13
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,816
Likes: 2,906
Liked 5,121 Times in 1,952 Posts
|
Re: 1971 Cutlass sx
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tar Heel
In NHRA form you're exactly correct ... can't be done. Put in Pure Stock form perhaps. We put less than that in our C5 (and those parts are CRAZY expensive) and run 1 second under.
From a quick investigation it appears to be a natural C car with a factory horsepower rating of 320 and factored to 340. That index in Pure Stock is 12.75 if he can get it down to a race weight of 3570. Again, I know nothing about these cars and I may looking at the wrong numbers but with a good set of headers, 4.56 gear, loose converter, and slicks wouldn't this be attainable?
|
I don't believe you would want to go as deep as a 4.56 with a 455 Olds
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers
|
|
|