|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,116
Likes: 1,573
Liked 1,829 Times in 414 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Anthem, Arizona
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
We need more Hot Rods in the class guide like the L-88's, ZL-1's, the Yenko Deuce and A/C Cobra's. With the new Supercars, there should be no such thing as "not enough made". Two or three ZL-1 'Vettes is adequate in my book. They made them, so let them race them. Same with Yenko Deuce's. A little common sense at NHRA and even a minor understanding of muscle car history should be adequate.
__________________
Jeff Lee 7494 D/S '70 AMX |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Whitecourt,Alberta,Canada
Posts: 236
Likes: 4,646
Liked 91 Times in 29 Posts
|
![]()
Opening up to these type of combos would be a great boost to the muscle car crowd. It might even help spark more interest.
Bruce Cameron |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,116
Likes: 1,573
Liked 1,829 Times in 414 Posts
|
![]()
We have a ZL-1. There's no real need to put it together. At 445HP rating, it won't make the power a "new COPO" 427/425 makes, and it puts us in BB.
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Tacoma, Washington
Posts: 1,632
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Danny Durham |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Kearney Mo
Posts: 197
Likes: 427
Liked 195 Times in 30 Posts
|
![]()
According to the National NOVA club there were a few documented 1967 L-79 350HP Chevy II also. Apparently there was a few motors left over from 66 and they went into the early 67"s.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 952
Likes: 567
Liked 198 Times in 79 Posts
|
![]()
I had two friends that owned one of these cars. I believe there were around 40-50 produced before the option was deleted.
__________________
Mike Fuller 396 STK 3961 SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Anthem, Arizona
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
Why would that option get deleted? Took to much shine away from the 'Vette?
__________________
Jeff Lee 7494 D/S '70 AMX |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
Posts: 785
Likes: 45
Liked 316 Times in 67 Posts
|
![]()
Some mid level marketing genius decided the 67 Camaro was their performance offering, Vettes for road courses, and Chevy II for economy.....in 68 the Nova once again jumped back into the HP race.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,116
Likes: 1,573
Liked 1,829 Times in 414 Posts
|
![]()
It was done because the Camaro was introduced in 1967, and they did not want to have the 67 Chevy II out perform the SS 350 67 Camaro. Another mistake by idiots in stupd departments in the automotive industry. They did not offer anything with more performance in their new performance car than a mild 350. It amazes me that no one had the intelligence to put a set of small dome pistons in the 350, add the heads, intake, and camshaft from the L-79 327, and stick a big Q-Jet on it. It took some true geniuses in some small offices to be so stupid as to have a 327 that made 350HP, and have a 350 that made less than 300HP, in the same size and weight package. Eventually, the stupid decision on the Camaro was over ruled, and the big block installed.
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|