|
![]() |
#11 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Kearney Mo
Posts: 197
Likes: 427
Liked 195 Times in 30 Posts
|
![]()
According to the National NOVA club there were a few documented 1967 L-79 350HP Chevy II also. Apparently there was a few motors left over from 66 and they went into the early 67"s.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 952
Likes: 567
Liked 198 Times in 79 Posts
|
![]()
I had two friends that owned one of these cars. I believe there were around 40-50 produced before the option was deleted.
__________________
Mike Fuller 396 STK 3961 SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Anthem, Arizona
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
Why would that option get deleted? Took to much shine away from the 'Vette?
__________________
Jeff Lee 7494 D/S '70 AMX |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
Posts: 785
Likes: 45
Liked 316 Times in 67 Posts
|
![]()
Some mid level marketing genius decided the 67 Camaro was their performance offering, Vettes for road courses, and Chevy II for economy.....in 68 the Nova once again jumped back into the HP race.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,115
Likes: 1,572
Liked 1,828 Times in 414 Posts
|
![]()
It was done because the Camaro was introduced in 1967, and they did not want to have the 67 Chevy II out perform the SS 350 67 Camaro. Another mistake by idiots in stupd departments in the automotive industry. They did not offer anything with more performance in their new performance car than a mild 350. It amazes me that no one had the intelligence to put a set of small dome pistons in the 350, add the heads, intake, and camshaft from the L-79 327, and stick a big Q-Jet on it. It took some true geniuses in some small offices to be so stupid as to have a 327 that made 350HP, and have a 350 that made less than 300HP, in the same size and weight package. Eventually, the stupid decision on the Camaro was over ruled, and the big block installed.
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,494
Likes: 3,596
Liked 7,734 Times in 1,739 Posts
|
![]()
Alan did you know that the early Camaro paperwork contained the 327/350 as a Camaro option? If you look up the old engine codes you can find that GM assigned block codes for a 327/350 Camaro too!
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm not spending 100K to win 2K |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,115
Likes: 1,572
Liked 1,828 Times in 414 Posts
|
![]()
I saw that somewhere. Never saw an actual car though. It always did amaze and amuse me that it took until the 4th year of production for the 350 to have a real hard core performance version. Given the prevailing market of the times, an LT-1, or the combination I posted up thread should have been built in 1967 as part of the first batch of 350 engines.
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Anthem, Arizona
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Jeff Lee 7494 D/S '70 AMX |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arkansas - In the middle of everything.
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 64
Liked 780 Times in 194 Posts
|
![]()
Also, Chev had planned a 3x2bbl small block engine for the '67 Camaro that was nixed before production. Several of the assembly manuals had pages referencing that engine that were marked "cancelled". I do not know any particulars about the internals, but it used the same chrome valve covers as the 350 option and a triangle air cleaner like the tri-power Corvettes. '67 was the first year of the 5-year 50,000 mile warranty and that may have had some bearing on the factory offering those performance engines.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
For what its worth Chevrolet only made 20 (TWENTY) PRODUCTION L-88's. These were the assembly line assembled cars. 17 are known to exist and 3 have the original engines. The rest have replacement engines no matter what the re stamped block says. The rest were cars with engines used as "Service parts" (engines) so they could be used in SCCA type of events. The famous "K-MOTION CORVETTE" from Motion performance in NY was NOT a real L-88 driven by the late Astoris Chas shown in car magazines. But who cares !! It was a car that made for "Wet Dreams"I have a copy of EVERY Corvette Black book printed and they ALL say 20 prodction L-88 cars I know personally the 2 guys who own the ZL-1's The Yellow one and the blue one. The blue one has NO paperwork and is about 1 hour from me here in Florida. The yellow one is fully documented and is also in Florida just off Rt # 4 at his dealership along with a cpl. of REAL L-88's of the 1967 varitey. A good friend had a RED 69 L-88 Coupe that he tried to race with a factory Turbo 400. This was before good torque converters.He was a salesman at a local Chevrolet dealer in Md. The guy with the white ZL-1 I do not know but it is supposed to be fully documented. . I have been a Corvette guy since before I had a drivers liscense. I have owned 11 of them and raced a few (not L-88s) including a 435 HP '67 roadster which was one of 20 (yes twenty) built that I ordered new with the M-22 trans. Look them up....its all there in the Corvette black book. Last edited by X-TECH MAN; 10-13-2013 at 08:29 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|