|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Spotsylvania,Va
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Spotsylvania,Va
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]()
Just so everyone understands. I am a straight up guy and say as I see it
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 1,084
Liked 184 Times in 113 Posts
|
![]()
I agree that this rule hurts the Intent of Pure Stock.
Having mixed opinion because the original rule was working to bring more cars in to Stock as a Pure Stocker. Just wondering why this topic was not discussed. The old rules were working just fine. Not a lot of us but enough to make the Class interesting. Drawing in the new cars and Racers interested in giving Class Racing a crack. That was the intent of Pure Stock. As for getting the ear of Mike. Yes...he likes working with me. Likes the fact of supporting Pure Stock and being an advocate of IHRA racing. I was making a difference and attracting folks getting interested in Class Racing. I post on IHRA blogg on LinkedIn. In the interest of speeding up a detailed tech inspection of a cam. I get that. Just think there were other ways to to speed up that process. Such as having the CamManufacturer declare the Cam was built to the intent of the Rules. Reputation means everything to a Manufacturer. A Cam Card Certified. Have it sent to an IHRA Tech person to measure it. Understand the Reffing part very well. How can the processes be designed so the Tech Inspection is quick and thorough? Made a suggestion to have Centers and Dates set up between races just for Tech Inspection. Meet in mass prepared and assisting the Inspectors. The number of IHRA National Records set is pathetic compared to NHRA. More cars Teched will take the National Record challenge. Other ideas need to collaborated with Racers. This was a bit of a shocker. Bottom line.. How can we make IHRA Better for every one than NHRA ? Dan Last edited by Dan Fahey; 12-18-2013 at 10:27 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]() Quote:
Scott Last edited by Tar Heel; 12-19-2013 at 09:15 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Somerset,Ky
Posts: 1,380
Likes: 371
Liked 319 Times in 108 Posts
|
![]()
I have mixed opinions on cam/spring rule.
There is probaly 3 factors for this decision,1 is speeds up tech,2 is many newer cars there aren't duration,overlap,spring specs.3 is not up to me to comment on,I'll just say someone loaned out some information and the borrower does'nt seem to want to return it for some reason I don't really like it but I will be changing my cam,valve springs,then probaly gearing in trans and rear and last but not least I'll be adding about 800-1200 rpm. I do like that will be able to run under K/S index in NHRA now instead of a little above,so will be able to run @ Bowling Green now without having to finish new engine. As far as driving pure stockers,later model cars were still drivable,but my older combo I could barely run under and be drivable,so drivability was gone for me along time ago,plus if could drive would still haul I don't like walking home. Mike Taylor 3601 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 1,084
Liked 184 Times in 113 Posts
|
![]()
Hello ALL:
Just had a nice conversation with IHRA in Norwalk this morning. Mike Baker and Jim Woods are on Vacation and aware of ALL of our comments. They are reading the comments on Class Racer. They recognized the new Cam and Spring issue has cause a firestorm. During our conversation discussed several items with them. After the Norwalk Management gets back from the holidays they will meet early January and revisit this issue. I am now speaking for myself. Just hope they keep the current rules. Think the reason was to speed up the Tech Process on Pure Stockers. Actually this was a good useful controversy. A lot of good stuff will come out of this. Saying all that. Everyone have a great holiday break. Sincerely, Dan Fahey |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 4,060
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times in 9 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Michael Beard - NHRA/IHRA 3216 S/SS |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Gulf Breeze, FL
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 8
Liked 33 Times in 16 Posts
|
![]()
Beginning to look like they just want to transition everyone over to Stock for convenience.
__________________
Rich Taylor I/SA - 321 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
|
![]()
Crate motors are now built motors, nothing "crate" or "pure" about them anymore, right?
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|