|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
|
![]()
We have a 1000lb Rimac (Can almost check my open pressure.) and an on-car tester (LSM).
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Not considering the springs issue. I don't see any additional cost between a cam under the new rules and a Bullet cam for today's rule.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 1,084
Liked 184 Times in 113 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Consensus is to keep the rules before the Change. However, Teching a cam require tedious measurement of Duration, Overlap, and measuring the Spring Rate. Lift is fairly easy. Hence the relaxing of the rules. However, the new Rules will kill Pure Stock Racing forever ! D |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Louisville , KY
Posts: 1,995
Likes: 69
Liked 279 Times in 68 Posts
|
![]()
Question for you guys. How many pure stockers made a run in IHRA in 2013? You all sound like this is the end of the world. Are the indexes changing? If not use your cam you are running now.
__________________
Greg Hill 4171 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 221
Likes: 50
Liked 38 Times in 17 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Your thoughts are spot on. Recently when it was mentioned what a travesty it was with no production cars in the guide so they couldn't run them in pure stock, my first thought was how many cars 5 years old or less ran in pure stock in 2008? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 1,084
Liked 184 Times in 113 Posts
|
![]()
Considering NHRA and IHRA only now have updated current Classification Guides there will be more interest. This year there was a record number of PSers built. More already being planned for 2014.
For the uninformed the reason for coming back to PS is fun. Costs are far lower and maintenance. Lets put it this way. You do not need exotic parts to keep them alive. Plus they are the old Stocker rules before CamAGedin! D |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 1,084
Liked 184 Times in 113 Posts
|
![]()
Btw there were 8 Pure Stockers at Darlington.
4 at most of the IHRA races I attended. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Elgin,IL
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 5
Liked 282 Times in 103 Posts
|
![]()
This is the best reply to the whole thread.IF there is a rule change,you are not FORCED to do anything.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 1,084
Liked 184 Times in 113 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Everyone did when they changed the rules for Stock. Think this would not be any different? More money expense, read Novassdude's posting. Considering the ROI, drop in Purses and Contingencies it is tough to run a full Stocker today. The new rules will kill PS ! Like TarHeal, would rather run Brackets. I like racing real Streetable cars, like Stock was intended to be. There has been an ill intent coming from racers wanting to kill Pure Stock. Received dirging comments in the past saying it is not real Stock. Well, here is your golden opportunity to kill PS. If it happens I am gone. Despite their ire, there is a growing interest in Pure Stock. If it is going to survive I will be here to improve our lot. However we need other advocates to speak up. Cannot do this alone.. D Last edited by Dan Fahey; 12-24-2013 at 12:40 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 589
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|