Are synthetic oils and lubricants any quicker

[1320racer]

Originally Posted by Alan Roehrich

It wasn't my "blanket statement", Ed, it was a statement by the API, and by the OEM's, regarding their products.

But, of course, I'm sure you know more than the API, and all of the OE automotive manufacturers, combined.

Alan, tell me/us where I can find the data/field test/results from the API as well the OEM specifically as it relates to using these oils and lubricants in drag racing engines, transmissions, rears and cars!

Originally Posted by buzzinhalfdozen

OK lets start with you've set up gears "for many years in your former chevelle"...so since you've claimed to make all these runs that equals 1 gear for the chevelle, since you've made it clear you simply cannot wear out or break a gear. Next the firebird looks like 2 for it, so a grand total of 3 gears. Now I NEVER claimed you cannot run an aluminum spool in these cars I SAID i run one in my own car, I said Mark Williams did NOT RECOMMEND IT! your claim is unbelievable to me, being as you're the 1 and only person in nearly 30 years that's ever made such a claim. Could be your experience is simply not typical, as pretty much everyone that responded has not had a similar one.

Being able to perform sucessfully simple arithmetic must not be a requirement for admission into the gm "college" or a prerequisite to earning your degree as a "master technician".

I've stated in this thread that I typically got 200 passes on a set of gears in my former chevelle which btw, I'm told is about 100 more than a similar weight B/SA Stocker with a 12 bolt. I've also stated that I typically make 250 passes a season so one with a 3rd grade education could conclude that I changed the gears in my chevelle every season and I raced that car for 17 years but I only started doing them in '97 IIRC, after discovering they were broken after parking for the bracket finals. The Firebird is on it's 2nd set of gear since I have own it which btw, as of the last day of this season has over 200 passes on them!

You absolutely infered I was lying!

As to what you said Mark Williams doesn't recommend, again a legal disclaimer as with most if not all racing parts and again noted stock/super stock chassis builders have and continue to install aluminum spools in cars weighing in excess of 2800 lb.s without issue or concern.

As for my truth and facts that you refuse to believe, call unbelieveable and refer to as a claim, how many of all those you've discussed this issue with over 30 years(btw, how old are you) were bracket racers, a bracket racer who makes at least 250 passes a season and a bracket racer that ran/runs a MW "Pro Stock" 3rd member with an aluminum spool in a state of the art super stock car weighing at least 3100+ lbs.?

[Rich67stang]

How come every time 1320Racer posts, it turns into a "**** Show" and the thread becomes useless?...I was interested in this thread. Is it worth it to run a "Pro Stock" third members over "standard" type third members? what would be the average et gain, if that can be measured.

[1320racer]

Originally Posted by Rich67stang

How come every time 1320Racer posts, it turns into a "**** Show" and the thread becomes useless?

I don't know, maybe it's because some here think that because they race stock/super stock they are smarter and more experienced than bracket racers no mind this bracket racer who runs a top shelf program and makes more passes every season than most stock/super stock racers.

[FED 387]

Now--- back to the original question-- Are synthetics any quicker or slower than other forms of rear gear lubes----- Do not care about gear life only results alsio I do not care about your technical expertise or lack of expertise WHAT WERE THE RESULTS ----Are they faster or slower and if so what were your results --Did you pick up or slow down??--Your experience please--No guesses or I think answers ONLYconcrete back to back results please!!!--Thank you FED387

[buzzinhalfdozen]

FED 387, please don't hold your breath on any actual reply from mr.1320 he has done everything BUT answer the question. Maybe when he's done blowing smoke up every ones wassu about how fast, reliable, and consistent his ride is.... Wait a moment, now it's 200 passes....well that's a bit less than 700 isn't it? BTW a recomendation from Mark Williams IS NOT A LEGAL DISCLAIMER.

[1320racer]

post #2...

Originally Posted by 1320racer

more ET to be had in running less lube/oil than there is in type.

[joespanova]

HERE:
This should help everyone clam down.

[Alan Roehrich]

Originally Posted by 1320racer

Alan, tell me/us where I can find the data/field test/results from the API as well the OEM specifically as it relates to using these oils and lubricants in drag racing engines, transmissions, rears and cars!



I've stated in this thread that I typically got 200 passes on a set of gears in my former chevelle which btw, I'm told is about 100 more than a similar weight B/SA Stocker with a 12 bolt.

The 4.88 gears in our 69 Camaro, running in A/SA and CC/SA, as a 427/425/435 (3650# minimum at A/SA) typically last about 4 years, which is about 400-600 passes. I took a set out that looked perfect after 4 years, put in a 5.00 gear, and it went about 150 passes before the heat treat apparently failed, since the gear pretty much fell apart, mostly on the coast side.

So if you're getting 200 passes out of yours, I'll stick with what I'm doing and getting about twice the gear life out of everything but that one set of 5.00 gears.

Hey, Kenny, sorry about the bandwidth, but I found that the genius bragging about knowing more than me while getting half the life out of a set of gears that I do was just too funny.

For the original post, yes, there can be power in synthetics, or at least ET and MPH. However, in the case of motor oil, it requires a ton of testing. You need to know what viscosity your engine requires due to the clearances and the oil pump, and you need to know what base oil and additive package makes your ring package happy.

You could find a synthetic of a light viscosity that makes the engine real happy with regard to friction, oil flow, and pressure, but makes the ring package and cylinder wall finish very unhappy, and you may actually slow down. You need to talk to your builder and find out what the actual minimum viscosity for your engine is, and he should also know what makes the rings work.

Some people have found that certain automatic transmissions and torque converters really like a synthetic hydraulic oil made for agricultural tractors. But your converter and transmission might hate it.

I do not know anyone who has tried the API GL-6 and half quart or so extra that Jimmy Bridges suggests who slowed down, or lost a gear. I wish I had gotten around to trying it with the 5.00 gear, it might have saved a gear that appears to have been weak.

[1320racer]

1. when I talk, it's about MY cars I don't refer to them as "our" car. So is this camaro you refer to YOUR car that YOU own and drive or not? Further, when I refer to MY cars, I don't make vague statements like "about 4-6 years and about 400-600 passes", I know exactly the duration of time and the number of runs and one would think that a claimed vastly more knowledgeable class racer would keep a log and too know EXACTLY the number of runs on every component.

2. By your lack of reference I'll take it that there is no data/field test/results from the API as well the OEM specifically as it relates to using these oils and lubricants in drag racing engines, transmissions, rears and cars!

3. 200 passes in the stock 1968 12 bolt under a 3880 lb. Chevelle that launched wheels up every pass, running as quick as 9.72 and 60 footing low 1.30s and a best of 1.28!



[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rbKYio6OvKM"]THE PROOF IS IN THE PERFORMANCE - YouTube[/ame]

3. if your replies in this thread is an example of your knowledge than without question I have more ON THE TRACK experience than you!

[Chad Rhodes]

If you were half as great as you think you are, you'd be world champ in every class. But alas, you're just a world class blowhard.