HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-19-2014, 06:47 PM   #1
Greg Hill
VIP Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Louisville , KY
Posts: 1,995
Likes: 69
Liked 279 Times in 68 Posts
Default Re: Header Retention Rule Revision

Who thinks up this s#%t?
__________________
Greg Hill 4171 STK
Greg Hill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2014, 07:01 PM   #2
jmcarter
VIP Member
 
jmcarter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Richmond Hill GA (and Port Ludlow WA)
Posts: 4,310
Likes: 2,434
Liked 3,232 Times in 983 Posts
Default Re: Header Retention Rule Revision

Summit and Jegs stocked up on a lot of them....they can't be too happy either. I especially hate it for guys like Keith Fulp, Mark Lelchook and other entrepreneurs who provided a service and were making modest profit. You know NHRA made them jump through hoops to gain approval. Now you buy NAPA approved and forego NHRA approved...go figure. Course I hate it for all us little guys who bit the bullet early, as it turns out they have "deluxe" retention.

Whole thing smells of NHRA's law department ran amok and then backtracked, or track operators voiced the concerns of thousands of bracket racers across the country.
__________________
Jim Carter
2340 Super Stock
2340 SST/2340 Stock
Set another place at the table
jmcarter is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2014, 07:08 PM   #3
jim powers
Member
 
jim powers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: manville nj
Posts: 359
Likes: 198
Liked 13 Times in 10 Posts
Angry Re: Header Retention Rule Revision

This is complete bull-- does anyone at nhra corporate have even the slimmest idea of what the hell they are doing??? this is a genuine screw job to anyone that abided by the new rules and installed a set of tethers, these people do not have the least concern for the racers---they probably didnt get their payoff so they changed the rules---i really can't believe the gaul of nhra
jim powers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2014, 07:29 PM   #4
Rick Bailey
Senior Member
 
Rick Bailey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 502
Likes: 5
Liked 10 Times in 7 Posts
Default Re: Header Retention Rule Revision

Ponder this ! If one can now fab a muffler/exh/collector hanger and that will pass the rules, then why in the hell can't he make his own teather . !


NHRA has really blown this !

Rick
__________________
Rick Bailey 3439 SC
Rick Bailey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2014, 08:02 PM   #5
Mark Markow
Senior Member
 
Mark Markow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: east hartford ct.
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: Header Retention Rule Revision

just like we all needed new window nets before , and they changed there mind. how many bought new nets for no reason.
__________________
Mark Markow
171 ss/tb
Mark Markow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2014, 08:41 PM   #6
Painter
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 227
Likes: 4
Liked 162 Times in 45 Posts
Default Re: Header Retention Rule Revision

So we can build our own race cars. We can drive our race cars. We get the opportunity to pay the excess insurance charge at national events. We go thru tech inspection at every race, our seat belts and helmets are carefully checked to make certain they are in date. But somebody that does not have a clue in hell about racing decides we need teathers, no wait a minute maybe one half inch stitch weld, oh well maybe a muffler hanger will work. I am pretty certain when I first started racing my car had coat hanger wire holding the tailpipe up. It did require "a tool" to remove. So I hope that Calvin Elston does not mind coat hanger wire holding up that beautiful set of headers he built me.
Painter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2014, 10:17 PM   #7
Gary Smith
Senior Member
 
Gary Smith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 820
Likes: 9
Liked 132 Times in 30 Posts
Default Re: Header Retention Rule Revision

Just when I was thinking about workin' on the stocker again....
__________________
Gary Smith
"another broke racer spectating"
Gary Smith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2014, 08:59 AM   #8
Mike Pearson
VIP Member
 
Mike Pearson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,470
Likes: 629
Liked 1,977 Times in 597 Posts
Default Re: Header Retention Rule Revision

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Markow View Post
just like we all needed new window nets before , and they changed there mind. how many bought new nets for no reason.
I have been stung on both of these issues. I really don't balk on any safety requirements. I work in the construction industry and this is nothing in comparison to OSHA.
__________________
Mike Pearson 2485 SS
Mike Pearson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2014, 12:42 PM   #9
buzzinhalfdozen
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Bellevue Ohio
Posts: 984
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times in 8 Posts
Default Re: Header Retention Rule Revision

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Markow View Post
just like we all needed new window nets before , and they changed there mind. how many bought new nets for no reason.
Yes, when I stated my disapproval of that rule I was put in my place by a certain legend of drag racing from the East coast, whom shall remain nameless. While I've realized for a while now drag racing is expensive....why keep piling on? Common sense rules that address REAL issues are fine but you cannot make it risk free it's impossible. There have probably been more people injured on pit vehicles than by collectors falling off, a local man died a year or two ago at our local track in a pit vehicle accident, merely celebrating a win and everything went wrong, tragic yes preventable?......
__________________
Joe Buchanan SS/BX 3117

Last edited by buzzinhalfdozen; 02-20-2014 at 12:59 PM.
buzzinhalfdozen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2014, 03:27 AM   #10
Bret Kepner
Member
 
Bret Kepner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Saint Louis, Missouri, USA
Posts: 418
Likes: 1
Liked 11 Times in 2 Posts
Default Re: Header Retention Rule Revision

For all the controversy this topic has raised, I wonder if anybody asked Rod Boertman his opinion on the rule?

Didn't think so.
__________________
Bret Kepner
BRETKEPNER@Prodigy.net
Saint Louis, Missouri, USA
Bret Kepner is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.