|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
|
![]()
I'm getting closer to settling on this. Thanks for ALL the "combinations".
Yes, it's more inclined to be a "torque engine", but it still does pull nice up at the big end.
__________________
Aubrey N Bruneau 6409 C/S 62 BelAir sport coupe, 409 HP 409 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 663
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
|
![]()
Aubrey...did you ever try launching it at 5000 rpm?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
|
![]()
I did in Medicine Hat... but traction wasn't dependable. When it did hook, it bogged.
I don't go there any more. Hoping for Mission in early June, but we're going on a big trip in May, for our daughter's wedding. That may stifle that particular race.
__________________
Aubrey N Bruneau 6409 C/S 62 BelAir sport coupe, 409 HP 409 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Tacoma, Washington
Posts: 1,632
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
|
![]()
I hope you can pull it off, Aubrey. It would be great to see you and the car again at Mission. Its one of my "must do" trips every year at one of my favorite tracks. Take care.
Danny Durham |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arkansas - In the middle of everything.
Posts: 2,002
Likes: 64
Liked 783 Times in 195 Posts
|
![]()
Aubrey, I would not be afraid of the 3.19 first gear. The super light clutch-flywheel assembly will allow you to accelerate the car without wheelspin. I would go with a 2.00 second and 1.40 third with the 3.19. The faster you can accelerate the car in the first half of the track, the lower the ET. Race setups have you in high gear at the eighth mark and it's just the ride from that point on regardless.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Avon, Indiana
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]() Quote:
Yep...
__________________
Scott Wilcox 2193 3x National Champion SS/A, SS/B, SS/K, SS/L, SS/AM, A/SM, C/SM, B/A, C/A, G/A, H/A |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dwight Southerland View Post Aubrey, I would not be afraid of the 3.19 first gear. The super light clutch-flywheel assembly will allow you to accelerate the car without wheelspin. I would go with a 2.00 second and 1.40 third with the 3.19. The faster you can accelerate the car in the first half of the track, the lower the ET. Race setups have you in high gear at the eighth mark and it's just the ride from that point on regardless. Yep... __________________ X2. |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,132
Likes: 1,605
Liked 1,914 Times in 429 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Yeah, that also fits in with the fact that he has changed to the correct theory on camshafts now, I'm betting he'll find more power and more RPM working with the correct lobe designs. That gearing combination will allow him to put the gains he'll make in the future to good use. Not breaking valvetrain components will allow him to race the car and learn, instead of trying to keep it in one piece and running. Racing is about to get much more fun!
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
|
![]()
I like your optimism, Alan !
Thanks again, everybody. I'm going to get back on the phone with Jerico, and come up with a combination based on what I'm hearing here. I DO want to stop breaking the engine because of the valve train... while not choosing a gear combination that will break the transmission ! My daughter is getting married on a cruise ship, touring between Italy and Spain. HHHMMM.... May have to settle for on a row boat in our local pond.
__________________
Aubrey N Bruneau 6409 C/S 62 BelAir sport coupe, 409 HP 409 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|