|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Langley (no igloos), British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 569
Likes: 311
Liked 285 Times in 87 Posts
|
![]()
Construction of a chassis for a car suited for SS generally have to be built to accommodate floor pan and frame height limitations. Four links for most combinations are not necessary and usually no one ever utilizes their infinite adjustments. Chassis tuning with shocks and tires and ballast have made things more common after basic link adjustments are made. Look for uniformity in the construction and tidiness of the workmanship, it means care was taken in the assembly of making it right. What is the reason for sale? Not many will invest to that point without competence of the builder. You would be surprised on whats out there and how well it works. MB.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Liberty City [East Texas]
Posts: 1,760
Likes: 5
Liked 99 Times in 60 Posts
|
![]()
Thanks for the comments. it looks like the above Ed Quay pic
__________________
Larry Woodfin 471W |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,833
Likes: 2,928
Liked 5,147 Times in 1,964 Posts
|
![]()
Years ago, some of the SS chassis builders would put the 4 link in the wheel tub to get around the unequal length bars..For instance the Pat Curran built, Jim Danuel, Cotton Perry/Allen Patterson/? / Sofranko Nova..
I seem to remember , when NHRA figured out what they were doing, they frowned on the practice..Could be wrong on that. Anyway unequal , equal shouldn't matter much...The operating principal is still the same.
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: east hartford ct.
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
there are a few problems with the unequal design. the short upper bar causes a severe pinion angle change during suspension travel. plus it has a much more limited adjustment range, as compared to an equal length setup. that being said there's a bunch of them out there. and usually aren't too much of an issue, except for with the higher hp cars.
__________________
Mark Markow 171 ss/tb |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
|
![]()
If it's an Eastexas Racecars (Vic Custer) Camaro, you should just buy it.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Liked 22 Times in 22 Posts
|
![]()
I ain't no chassis guru, but I've had four 4 link cars, and two were F body Camaros, one a Vic Custer car, the other a L.A. Automotive car, a home built 67 Nova, all three were unequal length. The cobalt is equal length. I also had an Ed Quay 67 Camaro with a ladder bar in SS\CS that left as smooth, or smoother then the 4 link cars. But again, I'm dumb on chassis setup. Now, this will blow some minds. The 67 deuce we are getting ready for paint has a split ladder bar set up. I will get some pictures when we get done. The housing is getting powder coated, or I would send some now.
__________________
don,t have one |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Avon, Indiana
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]()
x2
__________________
Scott Wilcox 2193 3x National Champion SS/A, SS/B, SS/K, SS/L, SS/AM, A/SM, C/SM, B/A, C/A, G/A, H/A |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|