|
|
07-01-2014, 09:35 PM
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 851
Likes: 981
Liked 2,343 Times in 465 Posts
|
Re: 67 Camaro 396 alum hd- front end weight?
I don't know if this will help you. But when I changed my 69 camaro from a 350/255 hp stocker to a 396/375 alum head stocker I didn't change a thing as far as front springs. I always ran the Moroso super stock ones for a small block. In the end I had to change the rear springs because they were bending at the rear eyes. Barry
|
|
|
|
|
Threaded Mode