HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock Tech
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-31-2014, 01:44 AM   #1
Rory McNeil
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: from Vancouver BC Canada, now in Nova Scotia
Posts: 1,311
Likes: 316
Liked 1,103 Times in 301 Posts
Default Re: Stocker roll cage bar beyond firewall rule......

Quote:
Originally Posted by Karl Owens View Post
That means cars that came originally equipped with a steering rack have an advantage.
Just curious as to what advantage a newer car that came with a rack & pinion steering system has that can be atributed to the steering rack, besides weight? Personally I have seen too many cobbled together rack installations in cars that origionally came with steering boxes , all in the interest of weight, space packaging, or because its "trick", with no thought given to toe change during suspension travel, bump steer, or other geometry issues. Frankly I would feel safer in a 40 year old factory engineered steering box setup in the car that was so equipped from Detroit, than some junkyard rack unit scabbed into the same car. If you are so concerned about the percieved dangers of all the dangerous "antique" factory stuff failing from age, maybe you need to either buy a new Stocker, or buy a Super Gas/Super Street full tube chassis, so you won`t be concerned about all this worn out dangerous factory installed metal. I can see it now, they allow racks, and then some people will be whining that they need to have new fabricated tube front frame rails to make it fit properly. Then they will need hand fabricated aluminum special oil pans to clear the rack. Of course new billet titanium spindles and coil over shocks would be "better" as they are purpose built and free of years of driving stress,....where does it all end? If you really feel that a rack is such a major advantage, then build a car that was factory equipped with one. I`m sure the guys racing 390/427/428 Ford unibody cars wish they didn`t have those damn shock towers in the way, same with early Novas. I bet more than a few MoPar racers wish they didn`t have to deal with the front torsion bars too. Point is, all cars have some pluses and minuses in their factory issued equipment, thats part of the challenge of the game. Besides, if NHRA doesn`t think the average racer is cabable enough to build their own header collector retaining devices, not much chance we could fabricate our own steering systems, right? As fas as I`m concerned, NHRA has already allowed far too much aftermarket lightweight (oops, I meant SAFER more modern equipment) in the class as it is.
__________________
NHRA 6390 STK
M/S 85 Mustang
Rory McNeil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2014, 07:18 AM   #2
Billy Nees
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,487
Likes: 3,588
Liked 7,688 Times in 1,732 Posts
Default Re: Stocker roll cage bar beyond firewall rule......

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Bravo!
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS

I'm not spending 100K to win 2K
Billy Nees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2014, 08:07 AM   #3
Robert Swartz
Senior Member
 
Robert Swartz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Nineveh, Indiana
Posts: 512
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: Stocker roll cage bar beyond firewall rule......

Quote:
Originally Posted by Billy Nees View Post
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Bravo!
x 2
__________________
Robert Swartz - Swartz & Lane 66 Chevy II Pro
95 Achieva EF/SA, 78 Mustang II U/SA (work in progress) #354 stock
Robert Swartz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2014, 08:23 AM   #4
Paul Merolla
Senior Member
 
Paul Merolla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Papillion, NE
Posts: 610
Likes: 242
Liked 293 Times in 65 Posts
Default Re: Stocker roll cage bar beyond firewall rule......

Well said, Rory!!!!!!
Paul Merolla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2014, 02:41 PM   #5
Bill Diehl
Member
 
Bill Diehl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 311
Likes: 2
Liked 9 Times in 8 Posts
Default Re: Stocker roll cage bar beyond firewall rule......

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rory McNeil View Post
Just curious as to what advantage a newer car that came with a rack & pinion steering system has that can be atributed to the steering rack, besides weight? Personally I have seen too many cobbled together rack installations in cars that origionally came with steering boxes , all in the interest of weight, space packaging, or because its "trick", with no thought given to toe change during suspension travel, bump steer, or other geometry issues. Frankly I would feel safer in a 40 year old factory engineered steering box setup in the car that was so equipped from Detroit, than some junkyard rack unit scabbed into the same car. If you are so concerned about the percieved dangers of all the dangerous "antique" factory stuff failing from age, maybe you need to either buy a new Stocker, or buy a Super Gas/Super Street full tube chassis, so you won`t be concerned about all this worn out dangerous factory installed metal. I can see it now, they allow racks, and then some people will be whining that they need to have new fabricated tube front frame rails to make it fit properly. Then they will need hand fabricated aluminum special oil pans to clear the rack. Of course new billet titanium spindles and coil over shocks would be "better" as they are purpose built and free of years of driving stress,....where does it all end? If you really feel that a rack is such a major advantage, then build a car that was factory equipped with one. I`m sure the guys racing 390/427/428 Ford unibody cars wish they didn`t have those damn shock towers in the way, same with early Novas. I bet more than a few MoPar racers wish they didn`t have to deal with the front torsion bars too. Point is, all cars have some pluses and minuses in their factory issued equipment, thats part of the challenge of the game. Besides, if NHRA doesn`t think the average racer is cabable enough to build their own header collector retaining devices, not much chance we could fabricate our own steering systems, right? As fas as I`m concerned, NHRA has already allowed far too much aftermarket lightweight (oops, I meant SAFER more modern equipment) in the class as it is.
If its a front steer car not much...if its a rear steer converted to a rack out in front lots.

There ya have it...I would like a rack out in front on mine too....but...hey wait, but I have got a 25.3 cage also.

Some of you guys have got to realize that there are "dual" purpose cars that are built out there, while they do fit into various NHRA "stock" eliminator classes they also are built to run with "big" power in many of the so called stock suspension "street" racing events across the country.

There can be a happy medium, just something for the purists to ponder

Last edited by Bill Diehl; 07-31-2014 at 02:43 PM.
Bill Diehl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2014, 04:14 PM   #6
kansas stocker
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: kansas
Posts: 235
Likes: 495
Liked 249 Times in 48 Posts
Default Re: Stocker roll cage bar beyond firewall rule......

Some of you might remember Pappy Welds sprint car from the '60s that 2 or three drivers died in and the car still looked good. Stronger than most bridges and no crumple area. If you don't feel safe in your stocker build a super stocker.
My $.02.
Pete
kansas stocker is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2014, 06:45 PM   #7
Karl Owens
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: Stocker roll cage bar beyond firewall rule......

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rory McNeil View Post
Just curious as to what advantage a newer car that came with a rack & pinion steering system has that can be atributed to the steering rack, besides weight? Personally I have seen too many cobbled together rack installations in cars that origionally came with steering boxes , all in the interest of weight, space packaging, or because its "trick", with no thought given to toe change during suspension travel, bump steer, or other geometry issues. Frankly I would feel safer in a 40 year old factory engineered steering box setup in the car that was so equipped from Detroit, than some junkyard rack unit scabbed into the same car. If you are so concerned about the percieved dangers of all the dangerous "antique" factory stuff failing from age, maybe you need to either buy a new Stocker, or buy a Super Gas/Super Street full tube chassis, so you won`t be concerned about all this worn out dangerous factory installed metal. I can see it now, they allow racks, and then some people will be whining that they need to have new fabricated tube front frame rails to make it fit properly. Then they will need hand fabricated aluminum special oil pans to clear the rack. Of course new billet titanium spindles and coil over shocks would be "better" as they are purpose built and free of years of driving stress,....where does it all end? If you really feel that a rack is such a major advantage, then build a car that was factory equipped with one. I`m sure the guys racing 390/427/428 Ford unibody cars wish they didn`t have those damn shock towers in the way, same with early Novas. I bet more than a few MoPar racers wish they didn`t have to deal with the front torsion bars too. Point is, all cars have some pluses and minuses in their factory issued equipment, thats part of the challenge of the game. Besides, if NHRA doesn`t think the average racer is cabable enough to build their own header collector retaining devices, not much chance we could fabricate our own steering systems, right? As fas as I`m concerned, NHRA has already allowed far too much aftermarket lightweight (oops, I meant SAFER more modern equipment) in the class as it is.

Thats easy for you to say because you have a 1985 Mustang which was equipped with rack and pinion steering since 1974. The first GM rear wheel drive car to have rack and pinion was the 93 Camaro/Firebird, the first rear wheel drive Mopar to have a steering rack was the Dakota truck in 87. I have a 92 Firebird which has stock type steering but heavily modified for oil pan clearance and has a 40 year old Vega steering box. My car exceeds 160 MPH in the quarter. I have personally witnessed 3 steering boxes break after coming down from a big wheelie. Ive never seen a rack break. If I did switch to a rack, I would make sure it was the correct width and make sure the bump steer was right. Steering and brakes are safety items and there should be no rules that compromise safety. NHRA allows aftermarket brakes which is far more of a performance enhancement than a steering system. Allowing front frame rails to flex is also ignoring safety.
__________________
NHRA Stock/Super Stock 1078
Karl Owens is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2014, 06:57 PM   #8
Billy Nees
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,487
Likes: 3,588
Liked 7,688 Times in 1,732 Posts
Default Re: Stocker roll cage bar beyond firewall rule......

Quote:
Originally Posted by Karl Owens View Post
I have a 92 Firebird which has stock type steering but heavily modified for oil pan clearance and has a 40 year old Vega steering box. My car exceeds 160 MPH in the quarter. I have personally witnessed 3 steering boxes break after coming down from a big wheelie.
OK, so put a STOCK 88 S-10 manual box in it! You don't have to modify ANYTHING like you did to put in the Vega box(that has a reputation for breaking). You could have even used the original pitman arm! OH, it weighs 5-6 pounds more than the Vega box. So for a few pounds on the nose of YOUR car, let's change the rules for everybody!
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS

I'm not spending 100K to win 2K
Billy Nees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2014, 07:03 PM   #9
Tom keedle
Senior Member
 
Tom keedle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Berthoud, Coloraduh
Posts: 695
Likes: 13
Liked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Default Re: Stocker roll cage bar beyond firewall rule......

Quote:
Originally Posted by Billy Nees View Post
OK, so put a STOCK 88 S-10 manual box in it! You don't have to modify ANYTHING like you did to put in the Vega box(that has a reputation for breaking). You could have even used the original pitman arm! OH, it weighs 5-6 pounds more than the Vega box. So for a few pounds on the nose of YOUR car, let's change the rules for everybody!
or buy a repop from flaming river/mullins/borgeson....and you can get them in aluminum,too
__________________
without losers,winning means nothing.
Tom keedle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2014, 07:04 PM   #10
Karl Owens
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: Stocker roll cage bar beyond firewall rule......

stock S-10 box wont work and it virtually the same anyway, my pitman arm is modified by Ed Quay to drop the entire steering system to clear my gigantic oil pan. The Firebird is a Super Stock/10.5 heads up car. Im just expressing my opinion on safety. My present stocker has a steering rack and doesn't run fast enough to even really need a helmet.
__________________
NHRA Stock/Super Stock 1078
Karl Owens is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.