EFI Systems

[pbp1]

If you are talking about Ernie Neal, we upgraded to version 2.05 at Indy. All of our updates are made available at no charge.
The XFI can run a Modular Ford with stock coils, LS coils, or the IGN -1A coils which work very well at high boost levels. As far as an RPM limit, the only thing I am aware of is on the coyote engine, there was an issue with the factory trigger wheel and Ford came out with this "High Rpm" version.

[pbp1]

I hate that we didn't connect at PRI. I would have been glad to go through the software with you.

[D.Johns]

Yes I was referring to Ernie and Dave Neal.

I have the high rpm pulse ring from Ford Racing for my engine. It's the supercharged coyote for Stock eliminator. It also uses a manual transmission.

It's been a slow process for me to build the car from the ground up. Tony Bischoff is building the engine. I'm trying to get all the little odds and end items squared away before May season opener. EFI system is one of the pieces I have to get taken care of before we hit the dyno. I've mainly only messed around with factory computers on all my other projects except for the Anderson Motorsport PMS. I understand a lot of what's going on and performing most of the calculations based off of formulas. Was wanting a system that was simple enough to pick up quickly, grow with system going deeper into tuning and also have a capabilty to adjust to different combinations of powerplants.

I'll look more into the FAST system to see what questions I may have like injector drivers etc.... The tech/customer service is a big deal for me. Holley seemed good when I was talking to them at the show. Now it appears FAST also has that. BS3 I'm unsure about...

It seems everyone has their own preference. For the most part no one has anything bad to say about another system. When talking to some guys about the only one some said to stay away from was megasquirt(didn't ask why nor did I check out their system first hand)

[countrypuppy4865]

I've worked with almost every major fuel injection system with the exception of the new Holley. Big stuff has almost no support. Unless you are best buddies with John Meany, or you have a good friend that knows a lot about big stuff. Fast is by far the easiest to use. They also have unmatched tech support, especially at the track. All of the new systems should have basically all the same features. However the ease of use of software and support are the most important intangibles for me. If you want an easy to use system with greats support FAST is the clear choice.

[SS3718]

Mr. Johns,
You can't go wrong with FAST! They have a great product and in my opinion the absolute best customer service out there! David Page and the group at FAST have been instrumental in the performance and success that we've experienced on the race track with our SBF 352!

Nick Morris
SS-3718
FGT/F

[Jeff Dona SS3269]

We have the FAST system on our LT1 Firebird and from day one the tech support we have gotten is second to none. When you talk with their tech people you can tell they are passionate about their job and want to give you the best product and tune up possible!!


Jeff Dona

[3131 SS]

We have the FAST system on our LT1 Camaro and the support and customer service at the track has been awesome!Thanks to David Page and FAST!! Ricky Decker

[Bobby Fazio]

Excited about my new FAST system and still reading instructions while my car is still in Virginia! How does load index differ from traditional speed density? Every track I race puts me at 97.5-99.5 kpa going downtrack so I figured I would change my y-axis to include a row for 97.5, 98.5, 99.5 kpa so I would have a row for any track I race at. When I first started I had a 95kpa row and the next row was 101kpa, so I could never get it exactly right going from a 97.5 track to 99.5 track. It would work for one track then have to be fixed for the next track. The differences between my three new rows are very minimal, just a little bit in the peak torque area just to keep the AF ratio consistent at all the northeast tracks.

Sounds like load index speed density calculates a load percentage based on the difference between Baro and manifold pressure, so does that mean I need an accurate row for (for example) 96%, 98%, 100%, etc.? I'm not yet understanding how the two types are different or how load indexed is the "easier" one to use. I'm guessing at Atco it would be close to 100% while in Norwalk it would be down to 90% or so?

[Brett C]

We use FAST on all of our stuff.