Boost Monitoring?

Tony Curcio · 01-28-2015, 08:32 PM

I believe it is already illegal to change or modify the impellers/rotors, that's part of what I'm on about. But I took a few minutes to check the 2014 rule book, and the only mention of superchargers in the Stock or Super Stock sections is in the engine blueprint specs, where a Whipple part number is specified for the COPO's and CJ's that are so equipped.

The boost sensor graph overlays the rpm graph anyway, so additional boost that results from more rpm would be easily separated. I suspect the CJ's will have the potential to eventually wind much higher than their Chevy or Dodge counterparts, but that's a whole 'nother topic.

Anyway, I can't help noticing that no one who actively participated in the FS classes last year has spoken up, so I guess they're happy with the status quo.

01-28-2015, 08:32 PM	#9
Tony Curcio Member Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: West Chester, PA Posts: 271 Likes: 1 Liked 4 Times in 1 Post	Re: Boost Monitoring I believe it is already illegal to change or modify the impellers/rotors, that's part of what I'm on about. But I took a few minutes to check the 2014 rule book, and the only mention of superchargers in the Stock or Super Stock sections is in the engine blueprint specs, where a Whipple part number is specified for the COPO's and CJ's that are so equipped. The boost sensor graph overlays the rpm graph anyway, so additional boost that results from more rpm would be easily separated. I suspect the CJ's will have the potential to eventually wind much higher than their Chevy or Dodge counterparts, but that's a whole 'nother topic. Anyway, I can't help noticing that no one who actively participated in the FS classes last year has spoken up, so I guess they're happy with the status quo. __________________ Tony Curcio 1860 STK