|
![]() |
#31 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Grosse Ile Mi.
Posts: 316
Likes: 84
Liked 13 Times in 7 Posts
|
![]()
Thanks Alan. That is on the agenda.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Grosse Ile Mi.
Posts: 316
Likes: 84
Liked 13 Times in 7 Posts
|
![]()
Following up on Alan's advise to track down the voltage loss at the TPS, I contacted a guy that Accel advised as a service rep for their product. I spoke to him several time last year when I was experiencing a no start condition and he was helpful
As I explained my low voltage to the TPS, he suggested unplugging the MAP sensor (which was getting a 5v input) and then checking the TPS input. Well, with both connectors disconnected (TPS and MAP), both input voltages from the ECM read 4.97 volts. When I installed the MAP sensor connector, the voltage to the TPS dropped back to 4.24V. I checked the ECM ground which is directly to the battery and the ground from the rear of the cyl. head and all were clean and tight. Would a defective MAP sensor cause excessive current draw and subsequently weaken the TPS input?? Not certain how that stuff works. The accel guy indicated the two circuits , although different pins in the ECM connector, have the same voltage reference source. He indicated a ground problem or possibly a bad MAP sensor. All input/experience appreciated. John |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Grosse Ile Mi.
Posts: 316
Likes: 84
Liked 13 Times in 7 Posts
|
![]()
Update: The above tests were run with the battery at 17V.
Here's a matrix to clarify test results: Both connectors attached: 3.75V TPS 3.75V MAP TPS connected/MAP disconnected: 5.0V TPS 5.0V MAP TPS disconnected/MAP connected: 4.2V TPS 4.2V MAP Both disconnected : 5.0V TPS 5.0V MAP Hopefully someone can make some sense out of this. The MAP sensor appears to be having the negative influence on the system. Help!! Thanks, John Last edited by John Nechiporchik; 04-14-2015 at 04:28 PM. Reason: more info |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
|
![]()
Simply substitute another MAP sensor and re-test.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#35 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,115
Likes: 1,572
Liked 1,829 Times in 414 Posts
|
![]()
John,
Do you have some sort of step down transformer/transistor reducing the voltage to your ECU to somewhere around 13.5 vdc, or is it happy with being supplied with 17 vdc? The reason I ask is that some ECU's do not like excessive voltage, and their internal regulators are not designed to deal with more than 14 vdc or so.
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#36 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Grosse Ile Mi.
Posts: 316
Likes: 84
Liked 13 Times in 7 Posts
|
![]()
Alan, The ECU is seeing direct voltage from 16volt battery.....typically 16.8 - 17 volts.
This set-up was in the car when I got it. The Accel support guy and I did not discuss this...but I will follow up and ask him. John Last edited by John Nechiporchik; 04-14-2015 at 06:51 PM. Reason: more info |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#37 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Grosse Ile Mi.
Posts: 316
Likes: 84
Liked 13 Times in 7 Posts
|
![]()
Installed new MAP sensor and the previous voltage of 3.75 dropped to 1.54 volts at the input side on both the MAP and TPS connectors.
For info purposes, I measured the resistance between the B and C terminals (volts in /signal out) on both MAP sensors with the following result: Old sensor : 343 New sensor: 24 (is this a reject?) INFO CORRECTED FROM ORIGINAL POST. Had the numbers switched Anyone have a reference number for this resistance?? Thanks, John Last edited by John Nechiporchik; 04-15-2015 at 08:14 AM. Reason: correction |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#38 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Div. 6, Eastern, WA
Posts: 710
Likes: 2,671
Liked 240 Times in 112 Posts
|
![]()
Umm ..... just a thought. The wire's didn't get mixed up did they ?
__________________
Dave Noll, EF/S ,?/SA 6526 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#39 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Grosse Ile Mi.
Posts: 316
Likes: 84
Liked 13 Times in 7 Posts
|
![]()
No they did not,
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#40 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 230
Likes: 1
Liked 80 Times in 44 Posts
|
![]()
When MAP sensors were common place and needed replacement we went with OEM. I had quit a few MAP and ECT sensors that weren't even close to specs. Like Ed said you need a good DVO meter to check for some problems. I use a Fluke 88 I have had for about 20 years. Not all MAP sensors have the same BAR specs as the vacume changes.
Kirk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|