HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock Tech
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-10-2015, 09:29 AM   #1
Mike Taylor 3601
VIP Member
 
Mike Taylor 3601's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Somerset,Ky
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 358
Liked 308 Times in 103 Posts
Default Re: Schubeck lifters

One I freshened up had trends I ended up having to restrict inside the lifters, could'nt get the right flow with oil restrictors in block,kept adding restriction to it till it looked good at the back rockers,but wouldn't oil the front or put oil out between lifter bores and lifters,
Ended up restricting inside of lifters to get it oiling right,probably could have done with restricted pushrods but it had good pushrod in it and didn't have a few ,more days to wait.
The correct thing would be have them make the lifters with oil hole moved up above oil band like most roller lifters.
Mike Taylor 3601
Mike Taylor 3601 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2015, 10:10 AM   #2
Alan Roehrich
Veteran Member
 
Alan Roehrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,124
Likes: 1,581
Liked 1,874 Times in 422 Posts
Default Re: Schubeck lifters

The drag racing lifters are different from the NASCAR lifters, they were designed when we had ball and stud rockers and not roller rockers. I'm pretty sure I can get Trend to do something if necessary. We had bad problems with the PPPC stuff that was made the way an edge orifice Z-28 lifter is made, they had to be modified, or they'd starve the top end and fry it.
__________________
Alan Roehrich
212A G/S
Alan Roehrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2015, 01:33 PM   #3
nolongerracing
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 173
Likes: 2
Liked 72 Times in 27 Posts
Default Re: Schubeck lifters

So, the best way to "break in" a new cam for Trend lifters is to purchase a set of Smith lifters, "break in the cam" (Smith lifters require no break in) buy the Trend lifters, "break in the cam", and PRAY. If you have to pay the engine builder to do this on his dyno, looks like about a 2 grand waste of money.
nolongerracing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2015, 06:29 PM   #4
Larry Hill
Live Reporter
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hickory, Ky
Posts: 10,660
Likes: 1,949
Liked 10,813 Times in 2,247 Posts
Default Re: Schubeck lifters

Just had a Schubeck junk my west coast swing engine. Same cam ,lifters, and stuff we have used for two or three years. Oil pan was full of ceramic and cam metal. I might be able to save rods and crank.


It might be time for roller lifters. Do any of the present cars, not copos, dragpaks, or C jets, have flat tappet lifters?
__________________
IHM Used Parts
https://ihmusedparts.com
888-821-1817

Last edited by Larry Hill; 10-17-2015 at 06:36 PM.
Larry Hill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2015, 08:29 PM   #5
Bruce Noland
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,855
Likes: 83
Liked 444 Times in 145 Posts
Default Re: Schubeck lifters

Larry I can feel your pain. I had two Schubecks crap out last year and a Smith lifter messed up my motor this year. Coated Precision tool steel lifters are the way to go. Talk to Chris at Comp.
__________________
Bruce Noland 1788 STK
Bruce Noland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2015, 08:47 AM   #6
Jeff Teuton
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Houma, LA
Posts: 2,717
Likes: 2
Liked 325 Times in 50 Posts
Default Re: Schubeck lifters

Just for information, I have a proposal into NHRA to allow aftermarket rollers in lieu of flat tappets. Why not try to get some folks to work on this. There has not been a flat tappet since the early 80's and I pointed that out along with only one manufacturer in the US. I know we squabble a bit, but those things are bad ancient unlike most of the old cars which are good ancient. Bruce, jump on that and get the troops to emailing CA and the Divisions. It's time for a change on that.
__________________
Jeff Teuton 4022 STK
Jeff Teuton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2015, 10:41 AM   #7
V M Kauffman
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Greentown, IN
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Schubeck lifters

With all the problems that racers have had with the Schubeck lifters why does a lot of racers continue to use them? Their just asking for trouble! How many has Schubeck replaced?
V M Kauffman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2015, 11:29 AM   #8
Greg Reimer 7376
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Glendora,Calif.
Posts: 1,137
Likes: 172
Liked 719 Times in 220 Posts
Cool Re: Schubeck lifters

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff Teuton View Post
Just for information, I have a proposal into NHRA to allow aftermarket rollers in lieu of flat tappets. Why not try to get some folks to work on this. There has not been a flat tappet since the early 80's and I pointed that out along with only one manufacturer in the US. I know we squabble a bit, but those things are bad ancient unlike most of the old cars which are good ancient. Bruce, jump on that and get the troops to emailing CA and the Divisions. It's time for a change on that.
Basically, you would need a cam ground straight across the lobe for roller lifters,not tapered for flat tappet lifters, the rollers, the link bar, what about a rev kit to keep the rollers in the block in the event of pushrod or rocker failure?Sounds like a good answer to the recent problems that have surfaced. I feel that a rational,sensible appeal to the tech department with this proposal is in order. So many 305 and 350 blocks are machined for the factory roller set up already,as is the Dart block. Seems to make sense that an aftermarket design exists for the OEM earlier blocks as well.Meanwhile,converting from ceramic base to tool steel lifters sounds like a good way out.
Greg Reimer 7376 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2015, 09:35 AM   #9
Todd Hoven
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Schubeck lifters

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff Teuton View Post
Just for information, I have a proposal into NHRA to allow aftermarket rollers in lieu of flat tappets. Why not try to get some folks to work on this. There has not been a flat tappet since the early 80's and I pointed that out along with only one manufacturer in the US. I know we squabble a bit, but those things are bad ancient unlike most of the old cars which are good ancient. Bruce, jump on that and get the troops to emailing CA and the Divisions. It's time for a change on that.
Wow, that sounds radical. I can't wait to hear what a 396 375 sounds like at 10000 RPM.
Since we are On that path, I think we should open up the valvetrain to Titanium valves and retainers. Don't forget clamshells on the camshaft.

This is just asking to get out eleminatior merged into superstock. I'm not interested 2k in new valvetrain parts just to keep up. NO THANKS. If you keep breaking stuff, spend money and do some spintron testing. Or buy a new car, and you get all that already.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2015, 11:08 AM   #10
nolongerracing
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 173
Likes: 2
Liked 72 Times in 27 Posts
Default Re: Schubeck lifters

Larry,
Did you have any other damage to your valvetrain? Broken rocker, damaged pushrod, loose adjuster?




Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry Hill View Post
Just had a Schubeck junk my west coast swing engine. Same cam ,lifters, and stuff we have used for two or three years. Oil pan was full of ceramic and cam metal. I might be able to save rods and crank.


It might be time for roller lifters. Do any of the present cars, not copos, dragpaks, or C jets, have flat tappet lifters?
nolongerracing is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.