HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-29-2016, 09:20 AM   #1
jmcarter
VIP Member
 
jmcarter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Richmond Hill GA (and Port Ludlow WA)
Posts: 4,293
Likes: 2,364
Liked 3,165 Times in 969 Posts
Default More horsepower adjustments....

Looks like a few really good racers just got a gift...


http://www.nhraracer.com/content/gen...639&zoneid=132
__________________
Jim Carter
2340 Super Stock
2340 SST/2340 Stock
Set another place at the table
jmcarter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2016, 12:14 PM   #2
Tom Moock
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 801
Likes: 1
Liked 10 Times in 6 Posts
Default Re: More horsepower adjustments....

hp. change`s for Stock or SuperStock?
__________________
Tom Moock 5704 STK
Tom Moock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2016, 12:43 PM   #3
Tony Janes
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Whittier, Ca
Posts: 830
Likes: 86
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: More horsepower adjustments....

Both
__________________
Tony Janes 7941 STK, SS
Tony Janes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2016, 02:38 PM   #4
Dwight Southerland
VIP Member
 
Dwight Southerland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arkansas - In the middle of everything.
Posts: 1,999
Likes: 64
Liked 772 Times in 192 Posts
Default Re: More horsepower adjustments....

ClassRacerInfo has the updates installed. Read'm


Interesting that I had to create a separate engine for the '69 Chev 427-425 with aluminum heads just to make the classification process work. Such a mucked up mess. The complaints about the 396-375 in the thread about roller lifters is duplicated in the 427. They didn't even build it like it is in the books, and people think that crate motors are a sacrilege.
__________________
Dwight Southerland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2016, 12:34 AM   #5
james schaechter
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cumming GA
Posts: 1,988
Likes: 1,281
Liked 1,428 Times in 296 Posts
Default Re: More horsepower adjustments....

I know the 327 250 hp 65 Chevelle was an error. Mattingly hit the automatic combo at BG, but no one in the stick combo hit it. They split the stick and auto combos and fixed the hp.
__________________
James Schaechter 3163 STK
james schaechter is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2016, 09:00 AM   #6
Frank Castros
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: The Lowcountry.
Posts: 2,959
Likes: 2,548
Liked 2,626 Times in 950 Posts
Default Re: More horsepower adjustments....

1976 Challenger?
Frank Castros is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2016, 11:57 AM   #7
SGE1340
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: dennysville, maine
Posts: 28
Likes: 1
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: More horsepower adjustments....

I caught the 1976 challenger too, that would be a rare combo! Not to be a whiner, but it appears that my combo has been re classified, going by what is on there, im no longer a natural A car, id be a AA/SA ? 1969 Camaro 427/425 . not only that but the horsepower got raised from 425 back up to 435 which is not right. Ive got a call in to Bruce about it.
SGE1340 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2016, 09:37 PM   #8
Tony Janes
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Whittier, Ca
Posts: 830
Likes: 86
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: More horsepower adjustments....

Quote:
Originally Posted by james schaechter View Post
I know the 327 250 hp 65 Chevelle was an error. Mattingly hit the automatic combo at BG, but no one in the stick combo hit it. They split the stick and auto combos and fixed the hp.
Jim that is correct.
__________________
Tony Janes 7941 STK, SS

Last edited by Tony Janes; 01-30-2016 at 11:43 PM.
Tony Janes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2016, 03:31 PM   #9
Alan Roehrich
Veteran Member
 
Alan Roehrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,104
Likes: 1,560
Liked 1,784 Times in 407 Posts
Default Re: More horsepower adjustments....

Quote:
Originally Posted by SGE1340 View Post
I caught the 1976 challenger too, that would be a rare combo! Not to be a whiner, but it appears that my combo has been re classified, going by what is on there, im no longer a natural A car, id be a AA/SA ? 1969 Camaro 427/425 . not only that but the horsepower got raised from 425 back up to 435 which is not right. Ive got a call in to Bruce about it.


Only the aluminum replacement head horsepower was raised back to 435 in Stock Eliminator. Which is where it had always been since the 401 head was allowed as a replacement head. It (the 401 head) was allowed with a 10HP penalty to begin with. We've run one that way since 2008 or so. I'm not sure I can reasonably disagree with the 10HP penalty, even though it would certainly be in our best interest. It takes 80 pounds of the nose of the car, among other things. I would prefer iron heads myself. Cylinder heads are a tricky item, how good they end up depends on how good a casting you start with, who you take them to, and what you let them do. The rules keep getting looser, and enforcement seems inconsistent.

With regards to the 359 intake, it depends upon what 163 you compare it to. I know a local racer who bought 10 163 intakes before the 359 was allowed, took them to the best local expert, who tossed 8 of them as bad. Of those, 5-6 were obvious to me, the other 2-3 I saw with a little help, and now I know what to look for. I know some who have gained a little with a 359, and some who have lost a little. We might have gained 0.02, I cannot say for sure. I have learned much since then.

No excuses here, we'd be just fine if they took the 359 intake, 401 heads, and roller rockers away. We'd have some expensive door stops, but we could recover and do just as well. I'll probably build a nasty old evil 396 next anyway.

With regards to classification, both Bruce Bachelder and Danny Gracia told me that the 10HP penalty for the 401 head was not considered in factoring the class. For example, I was told that the 401 head on a 427/425 in a 69 Chevelle with an automatic did not make it a natural A car. It remained a natural B car due to the factor (425) of the original engine without the 401, which was considered the "base" for calculation, the replacement penalty was not considered for the class factor, only for the class weight. That may have changed.
__________________
Alan Roehrich
212A G/S
Alan Roehrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2016, 11:07 PM   #10
Dave Ficacci
Member
 
Dave Ficacci's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Jersey
Posts: 371
Likes: 43
Liked 98 Times in 23 Posts
Default Re: More horsepower adjustments....

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Roehrich View Post
Only the aluminum replacement head horsepower was raised back to 435 in Stock Eliminator. Which is where it had always been since the 401 head was allowed as a replacement head. It (the 401 head) was allowed with a 10HP penalty to begin with. We've run one that way since 2008 or so. I'm not sure I can reasonably disagree with the 10HP penalty, even though it would certainly be in our best interest. It takes 80 pounds of the nose of the car, among other things. I would prefer iron heads myself. Cylinder heads are a tricky item, how good they end up depends on how good a casting you start with, who you take them to, and what you let them do. The rules keep getting looser, and enforcement seems inconsistent.

With regards to the 359 intake, it depends upon what 163 you compare it to. I know a local racer who bought 10 163 intakes before the 359 was allowed, took them to the best local expert, who tossed 8 of them as bad. Of those, 5-6 were obvious to me, the other 2-3 I saw with a little help, and now I know what to look for. I know some who have gained a little with a 359, and some who have lost a little. We might have gained 0.02, I cannot say for sure. I have learned much since then.

No excuses here, we'd be just fine if they took the 359 intake, 401 heads, and roller rockers away. We'd have some expensive door stops, but we could recover and do just as well. I'll probably build a nasty old evil 396 next anyway.

With regards to classification, both Bruce Bachelder and Danny Gracia told me that the 10HP penalty for the 401 head was not considered in factoring the class. For example, I was told that the 401 head on a 427/425 in a 69 Chevelle with an automatic did not make it a natural A car. It remained a natural B car due to the factor (425) of the original engine without the 401, which was considered the "base" for calculation, the replacement penalty was not considered for the class factor, only for the class weight. That may have changed.
427 with the 401 aluminum head has always been 435. NHRA made a mistake when updating the guide in January of last year and listed it at 425 which was eventually corrected back to 435 before the season opener. I know some racers missed the update and ran this combo all of last year at 425.
__________________
Dave Ficacci
1013 STK
1170 SS
Dave Ficacci is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.