|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 674
Likes: 15
Liked 584 Times in 94 Posts
|
![]()
Mike , I think you're pretty darn close. At Indy last year the field was pretty well set on Wednesday ( per usual ). The weather really turned to **** on Thursday. On Wednesday I had a severe case of Indyidis. My head was so far up my rear end I could see my tonsils. While nearly everyone slowed a tenth to 15 hun on Thursday, I decided to view the sunlight and picked up a 10th. I "think" I could of ( woulda coulda shoulda) run 9.78 - 9.80 on Wednesday ( not good enough ). Had Chuck come to Indy he might have gotten in with a 9.70 or 9.71. If Brian would have shown with the Alum. Chevy, on kill, he may have run even better in that junk air, maybe 9.67- 9.70. But, with that said "maybe" two of the fastest AA/SA in the country might have gotten in around 126 -128. The fact is they didn't even bother to show. I think that tells it all. I love stock eliminator racing, all classes, but I also know that the fans would rather watch "the faster" cars. In this new era of NHRA, I would think from a spectator stand point they'd like these faster cars to show up at their major venue races. It's pretty cool to see a AA car chasing down a U / stocker! But you have to be able to race on race day. One thing for sure, class eliminations would be a lot more fun. And with an index adjustment AA/stock ...might ...(and that's a stretch).. stand chance if they have to run the combo.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Houma, LA
Posts: 2,717
Likes: 2
Liked 325 Times in 50 Posts
|
![]()
10.80 or 10.85.
__________________
Jeff Teuton 4022 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 294
Likes: 102
Liked 24 Times in 13 Posts
|
![]()
Ahhhh the voice of reason has finally spoken.
C'mon Larry....let's hear it from you. Your dog will be back in this hunt real soon...so you don't get a pass here....nor do you really want one!
__________________
Mike Keener A/S B/S C/SM |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Iowa
Posts: 209
Likes: 422
Liked 210 Times in 88 Posts
|
![]()
The AA/S (10.60) and A/S (10.95) combinations fall into SS/D (10.20) SS/E (10.25). Why are the SS indexs (.05 for the stick and .15 for auto) so tight and the Stock indexs spread out ( .35 for stick and .40 for the auto) so far?
MOST of the cars are factored at or around 400hp/200 lbs. The difference between some of the "natural" AA cars and A cars are light weight body components / fresh air with both using identical engines. Additional HP factors in most cases do reflect the "special" components which in reallity negate their use/exsistence. Not sure what I am trying to say...may have answered my own question. 10.80 to 10.85 would make sense. Phil |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
I don't have a dog in this fight but I definitely feel like 10.75-10.80 makes more sense on the index and realistically A/SA should be 10.05 or if it stays at 10.00 B/SA should be 10.20 to make everything fall in line...just my 2 cents
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Houma, LA
Posts: 2,717
Likes: 2
Liked 325 Times in 50 Posts
|
![]()
Sherman, hush up and leave B/SA alone. I just got here. hehehehe Next thing I know you will be wearing cowboy boots and riding some nag. Must be the air in Texas does that.
__________________
Jeff Teuton 4022 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|