Qualifying with no AHFS

[Darrel Goheen]

I constantly hear different people looking for a less popular class or one that no one else is in.....all trying to avoid a heads up race just like I want to do. I understand those that desire to work hard to get the performance but it seems with one or two changes we could all have what we want to a degree. Here's what I'd like to see. Points rounds should all be a bracket race instead of only when you draw someone in in your class.

I have no problem at all with qualifying based on performance.

Ah NO!!! Go race all the great 10K and up races that Mike Beard talks about all the time. If you want to race stock, there is a chance of heads up in eleminations. If you don't want that, then find another venue. Or build a car that can run classes less populated. Done

Originally Posted by Darrel Goheen

I constantly hear different people looking for a less popular class or one that no one else is in.....all trying to avoid a heads up race just like I want to do. I understand those that desire to work hard to get the performance but it seems with one or two changes we could all have what we want to a degree. Here's what I'd like to see. Points rounds should all be a bracket race instead of only when you draw someone in in your class.

I have no problem at all with qualifying based on performance.

[Dwight Southerland]

Those who want to tout the "good ole glory days" should remember that the same fears and reality chased Stock racers away from the big races back then - the opportunists in the low classes. The cars people have in mind now that will have the advantage are the low class cars, just like back then. Remember the Y/SA Chevelle 6 cyl wagon of Eugene Chaisson and Bob Shaw's Corvair at the 1976 Sportsnationals to know that things have not changed much.


SO, if we have a true "performance based" eliminator, how many people would do the smart, practical thing and build a 13-sec competitor, or stay with their 10-sec beauty queen and just gripe?

[Sean Cour]

Originally Posted by Dwight Southerland

Those who want to tout the "good ole glory days" should remember that the same fears and reality chased Stock racers away from the big races back then - the opportunists in the low classes. The cars people have in mind now that will have the advantage are the low class cars, just like back then. Remember the Y/SA Chevelle 6 cyl wagon of Eugene Chaisson and Bob Shaw's Corvair at the 1976 Sportsnationals to know that things have not changed much.


SO, if we have a true "performance based" eliminator, how many people would do the smart, practical thing and build a 13-sec competitor, or stay with their 10-sec beauty queen and just gripe?

I would.

[Darrel Goheen]

Originally Posted by Todd Hoven

Ah NO!!! Go race all the great 10K and up races that Mike Beard talks about all the time. If you want to race stock, there is a chance of heads up in eleminations. If you don't want that, then find another venue. Or build a car that can run classes less populated. Done

I knew about the heads up thing going into stock (because that's what I heard complained about the most) but if the majority (as it seems is the case) would rather not have a heads up race in regular eliminations why not change it? Leaving it like it is just because that's the way it's always been doesn't make it right. Change isn't always a bad thing. I know a guy that only ran his first and last event last year and was unlucky enough to draw a fast heads up first round. I felt really bad for him. He worked his tail off to run stock and then that happened. I'd be surprised if he tries stock again.

I'd be curious to know if the quicker cars in class if the engines were built by the car owners/drivers vs. buying them from a builder. If the latter is true it's just a money class (more money=more performance).

I'd also be curious as to whether stock racers would rather see more stock cars or less at a race. If the latter is true why not change it to run eliminations like they do in the class combo.... Dial everyone at index and whoever gets there first wins. That would make it a true performance class.

[Sean Cour]

Originally Posted by Darrel Goheen

I knew about the heads up thing going into stock (because that's what I heard complained about the most) but if the majority (as it seems is the case) would rather not have a heads up race in regular eliminations why not change it? Leaving it like it is just because that's the way it's always been doesn't make it right. Change isn't always a bad thing. I know a guy that only ran his first and last event last year and was unlucky enough to draw a fast heads up first round. I felt really bad for him. He worked his tail off to run stock and then that happened. I'd be surprised if he tries stock again.

I'd be curious to know if the quicker cars in class if the engines were built by the car owners/drivers vs. buying them from a builder. If the latter is true it's just a money class (more money=more performance).

I'd also be curious as to whether stock racers would rather see more stock cars or less at a race. If the latter is true why not change it to run eliminations like they do in the class combo.... Dial everyone at index and whoever gets there first wins. That would make it a true performance class.

Darrel, it's called racing for a reason. It's not supposed to be cheap.

[Darrel Goheen]

Originally Posted by Sean Cour

Darrel, it's called racing for a reason. It's not supposed to be cheap.

That is for sure!

[Larry Hill]

I have a backyard engine most of it done in my backyard. I have always looked forward to heads up runs. It took me over a year to get the Cuda to run the Index. Every heads up run is a report card on how you and your car are doing against the competition. Class racing is heads up racing at its best The rule book described this before you made the decision to come race. Do what is fun for you.

[Paul Merolla]

Originally Posted by larry hill

i have a backyard engine most of it done in my backyard. I have always looked forward to heads up runs. It took me over a year to get the cuda to run the index. Every heads up run is a report card on how you and your car are doing against the competition. Class racing is heads up racing at its best the rule book described this before you made the decision to come race. Do what is fun for you.

yes!!!

X2!!!!! 👍

Originally Posted by larry hill

i have a backyard engine most of it done in my backyard. I have always looked forward to heads up runs. It took me over a year to get the cuda to run the index. Every heads up run is a report card on how you and your car are doing against the competition. Class racing is heads up racing at its best the rule book described this before you made the decision to come race. Do what is fun for you.