|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
|
![]()
ET brackets is entry level. Stock is not.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: LONG ISLAND N.Y.
Posts: 1,698
Likes: 3,465
Liked 1,865 Times in 435 Posts
|
![]()
Correct. Come on Casey I know you for some time. You wouldn't spend it if you had it anyway lol. Entry level for stock is under $20000 for a decent car. And a bracket car cost $$$$$$$.
__________________
james perrone 1290 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 703
Likes: 450
Liked 174 Times in 39 Posts
|
![]()
Who would anyone build a factory rated street combination when there are so many under-rated CJ/DP/COPO (and de-rated street Challengers....) combinations to choose from? Some of them cost a significant amount more money to build, but not all of them.
One specific combo I see mentioned here is the 2010 Camaro rated at 400hp. For comparison, the 1999-02 LS1 Camaro/Firebird is rated at 382, and while it's definitely not a killer combo like it used to be, it looks like two of them qualified at .90+ under at Indy this year. The '10 engine has 30 more cubic inches, slightly bigger valves, and similar other specs according to the guide. Maybe I'm off base here, but shouldn't that be capable of making 30 hp more than an LS1? Yes, you'd have to build a good, well sorted car to be competitive, but what's wrong with that?
__________________
3207 D/SA, C/ED |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 706
Likes: 128
Liked 508 Times in 92 Posts
|
![]()
James, see you at Englishtown
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Houma, LA
Posts: 2,717
Likes: 2
Liked 325 Times in 50 Posts
|
![]()
I think my dues are up to date. I got more paid in dues than I have in Social Security.
__________________
Jeff Teuton 4022 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 27
Likes: 5
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
Can anyone explain why shipping weights in gt can only be adjusted plus or minus 250 lbs to move up or down in classes but in regular superstock its now unlimited? Didnt gt get the 250 rule based off the regular superstock rule? It must have been inadvertently deleted at some point?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Arizona, Texan forever
Posts: 1,179
Likes: 881
Liked 606 Times in 213 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Gary Hansen - SS/FA 4911, B/SA 4911 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|