HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 12-20-2007, 11:28 AM   #11
Dave Harlequin
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Alexandria,Mn.
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thumbs up Why Doesn't Ihra Just Combine Div. 3 & 5 In '08 ???

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mayfield360otc View Post
Let's wake up & admit with all the original Div.5 tracks Pro-Am events long gone (Great Lakes,Cedar Falls,Cordova,Eddyville,Wis.Inter,Minot,Thunder Valley,US-41 ect,ect) Why not just eliminate IHRA Div.5 once & for all ?? Face it all the '07 IHRA Div.5 events (Byron,Mich131 & Osceola) were in Div.3 anyway....So why not just terminate Div.5 once & for all and add all those events to a new bigger expanded '08 IHRA Div.3 schedule??? What's the point in trying to keep Div.5 alive hanging on by thumbnails and tarnishing all the good memories of Div.5 Commander Alex & Tony Dennysenko worked so hard for from 2000-2004 when they got Bill Bader to move IHRA west to begin with in the first place. Merry X-Mas & Happy Holidays.
Unless IHRA is going to have Pro-Am's again back in the original Div.5 confinds of Wis,Iowa,S.D. ect again this comming season.... Why not just combine divisions 3 & 5 for 2008 & stop all the pain & suffering of having to watch Div.5 die a slow death track by track does that make too much sense or not ???

Last edited by Dave Harlequin; 12-20-2007 at 11:37 AM.
Dave Harlequin is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.