HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-05-2016, 09:02 PM   #1
MR DERBY CITY
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Derby City, USA
Posts: 3,664
Likes: 1,094
Liked 8,223 Times in 1,538 Posts
Default Re: Las Vegas super stock wreck, no DQ, pictures included

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Yacavone View Post
Tell me about, Mike. Using Freeze in a can is clearly illegal too..But apparently it's okay now , late at night, right behind the tower.
Oh come on Mark, no self respected racer would do that as it's clearly in violation of the rules .......
MR DERBY CITY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2016, 06:04 AM   #2
Dan Fletcher
Sponsor
 
Dan Fletcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Churchville, NY
Posts: 493
Likes: 130
Liked 1,045 Times in 70 Posts
Default Re: Las Vegas super stock wreck, no DQ, pictures included

I've often wondered why the computer dust off spray was deemed illegal to begin with. How isn't that better than ice on the track?
__________________
Dan Fletcher 1781 STK, SS, COMP, SG, SC

DAN FLETCHER TRAILER SALES

Dan Fletcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2016, 10:46 AM   #3
Jeff Teuton
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Houma, LA
Posts: 2,717
Likes: 2
Liked 325 Times in 50 Posts
Default Re: Las Vegas super stock wreck, no DQ, pictures included

I think in the Top Stock days, we frightened the officials by empting 4 to 6 cans right before we pulled into the water box. Looked like a smokey burnout under the hood. And I think NHRA followed suit.
__________________
Jeff Teuton 4022 STK
Jeff Teuton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2016, 11:03 AM   #4
HandOverFist
VIP Member
 
HandOverFist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Gulf Breeze, FL
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 8
Liked 33 Times in 16 Posts
Default Re: Las Vegas super stock wreck, no DQ, pictures included

https://www.facebook.com/allen.sherm...type=3&theater

Last edited by HandOverFist; 11-06-2016 at 11:15 AM.
HandOverFist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2016, 11:24 AM   #5
dragracer2011
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: Las Vegas super stock wreck, no DQ, pictures included

So the Hughes kid got DQ'd on a bye run at 3 cars cause they suspected he knew he had brake problems when they had proved via racepak he had brake pressure when he staged, but this guy doesn't because there were no skid marks but you can clearly see in the video what happened? I am sorry, I don't get this at all, just my .02

Last edited by dragracer2011; 11-06-2016 at 08:10 PM.
dragracer2011 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2016, 11:27 AM   #6
HR9121
Live Reporter
 
HR9121's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: New Bern, NC
Posts: 3,467
Likes: 146
Liked 3,363 Times in 731 Posts
Default Re: Las Vegas super stock wreck, no DQ, pictures included

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Fletcher View Post
I've often wondered why the computer dust off spray was deemed illegal to begin with. How isn't that better than ice on the track?
Probably because there's more profit for the track in a bag of ice since most tracks charge 10 bucks for a bag of frozen water!
__________________
James Williamson
W200 J/SA. SS/JA
HR9121 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2016, 01:43 PM   #7
Allen Sherman
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: Las Vegas super stock wreck, no DQ, pictures included

Quote:
Originally Posted by HR9121 View Post
Probably because there's more profit for the track in a bag of ice since most tracks charge 10 bucks for a bag of frozen water!
LOL!! The frozen water business is definitely high profit at the track! But I totally agree with fletch, the spray was way less mess
Allen Sherman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2016, 11:36 PM   #8
mikey767
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Las Vegas super stock wreck, no DQ, pictures included

I agree with fletcher. The can is less of a mess than ice but in Div 7 they don't mind. Last year in a heads up, my opponent dropped dry ice all over the track and he wasn't dq!!!
mikey767 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2016, 09:51 AM   #9
Bobby DiDomenico
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 924
Likes: 106
Liked 101 Times in 52 Posts
Default Re: Las Vegas super stock wreck, no DQ, pictures included

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Fletcher View Post
I've often wondered why the computer dust off spray was deemed illegal to begin with. How isn't that better than ice on the track?
Way better from a fluid on track perspective! Remember doing it at Joliet once on a Nova after pushing it from the near end of the pits. Don't recall doing it on Tom and Carol's Top Stock car. Remember IHRA giving Morgan a real hard time on it at a race, still don't know why cant believe an aluminum intake can wick that much heat. Real world, someone would have to test back to back to see if the aerosol cans actually work in 95 degree sunshine by the time you stage or if it all just a placebo.

As to the braking issue, didn't Bruno smack the wall in Chicago a few years back? I think who ever was driving his Camaro this year didn't hit anything but had it get loose at the stripe. I did it once at Union Grove on grudge night with a Turbo Regal. Dialed 14 something against a 9 or 10 second Modified Eliminator Bug. I'm way down track looking back and forth in the mirror waiting for his green light and coasting near 1000' and finally realize they dialed me in at 19 seconds. Looked like 14 at the line... I hit the brakes and he said it looked like tire smoke billowing but being on four stock Goodyears it was just like driving on a Chicago expressway, no issues. I did learn a lesson and just dialed it in at 19 seconds after that. Nice and cool going down track in July with the A/C working

Last edited by Bobby DiDomenico; 11-07-2016 at 10:06 AM.
Bobby DiDomenico is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2016, 06:32 PM   #10
Tom Meyer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Pierce NE
Posts: 937
Likes: 78
Liked 354 Times in 120 Posts
Default Re: Las Vegas super stock wreck, no DQ, pictures included

Car#-Driver(Opp'nt)-RT-----ET-- Speed-----Car#-Driver(Opp'nt)-RT-----ET-- Speed
6 David Rampy 1781 Dan Fletcher
E5 0.026 10.203 129.47 ****WINNER**** 0.009 10.401 117.41
GT/HA Dial: 10.18 (+/-): 0.023 FSS/I Dial: 10.37 (+/-): 0.031
Prior rounds:
E4 (D Keen ) 0.011 10.152 0.002 (A Emmer ) 0.017 10.360 0.040
E3 (M Cotten ) 0.011 10.135 0.005 (A Stanfield ) 0.022 10.311 0.001
E2 (T Janes ) 0.014 10.203 0.043 (D Barcelon ) 0.033 10.351 0.011
E1 (D Bridgewate) 0.006 10.154 0.024 (K Angeles Pa) 0.016 10.356 0.026
Qualified: #9 10.157 -0.893 #56 10.242 -0.208

Dan Fletcher leaves first with a nine light and smokes the tire in the light to not break out.MOV: 0.0095 seconds (approximately 22 inches).

Nothing against Dan but?
__________________
Tom Meyer 5240 SS Stock ???
Tom Meyer is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.