HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-17-2016, 03:20 PM   #91
novassdude
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: usa
Posts: 752
Likes: 204
Liked 136 Times in 49 Posts
Default Re: A case for Tru-Start

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andys dad View Post
Here is a "new" thought - they should both be out - no almost winner.

Red light and you lose - simple to figure out.

Does not favor fast or slow cars - favors good drivers.


Ron
I like it Fair for everyone.
novassdude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2016, 03:39 PM   #92
Another Friendly Racer
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Liked 19 Times in 6 Posts
Default Re: A case for Tru-Start

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bernie Cunningham View Post
Please explain, thx, B
Reasons to be against Tru-Start:

* I don't understand what Tru-Start is.

* I have a higher classified car and like my advantage as the game currently stands.

* My motives/intelligence/manhood will be questioned over internet message boards if I support this change.

* Peter and Kyle are successful enough. I feel envious.

* Change scares me.
Another Friendly Racer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2016, 03:42 PM   #93
Mickey Whaley
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,220
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Lightbulb Re: A case for Tru-Start

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Mulry View Post
I still can't believe the amount of people that don't get it
You are right it has worked forever now they want a change whats next free entry fees LOL
Mickey Whaley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2016, 03:46 PM   #94
Mickey Whaley
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,220
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: A case for Tru-Start

Quote:
Originally Posted by Another Friendly Racer View Post
Reasons to be against Tru-Start:

* I don't understand what Tru-Start is.

* I have a higher classified car and like my advantage as the game currently stands.

* My motives/intelligence/manhood will be questioned over internet message boards if I support this change.

* Peter and Kyle are successful enough. I feel envious.

* Change scares me.
What class do you run and your name?
Mickey Whaley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2016, 03:48 PM   #95
Bob Mulry
VIP Member
 
Bob Mulry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Coarsegold, CA
Posts: 1,016
Likes: 57
Liked 320 Times in 102 Posts
Default Re: A case for Tru-Start

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mickey Whaley View Post
You are right it has worked forever now they want a change whats next free entry fees LOL

I guess that you didn't get it either.....
__________________
Bob Mulry 7516 STK
A & M Motorsports
Bob Mulry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2016, 03:54 PM   #96
Mickey Whaley
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,220
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: A case for Tru-Start

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Mulry View Post
I guess that you didn't get it either.....
Yep I get the electric bill and pay taxes just like always you don't get it
Mickey Whaley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2016, 04:29 PM   #97
7423
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 639
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: A case for Tru-Start

Quote:
Originally Posted by Another Friendly Racer View Post
Reasons to be against Tru-Start:

* I don't understand what Tru-Start is.

* I have a higher classified car and like my advantage as the game currently stands.

* My motives/intelligence/manhood will be questioned over internet message boards if I support this change.

* Peter and Kyle are successful enough. I feel envious.

* Change scares me.
I would say that perfectly describes a large group on this thread....................How much of this covers your thoughts Mickey Whaley??
7423 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2016, 04:51 PM   #98
Mickey Whaley
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,220
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: A case for Tru-Start

Quote:
Originally Posted by 7423 View Post
I would say that perfectly describes a large group on this thread....................How much of this covers your thoughts Mickey Whaley??
You are right Charlie I run motorcycles only but I can run my dial in the people I see here have never won a damn thing see if NHRA changes anything for you CHARLIE ????????
Mickey Whaley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2016, 05:01 PM   #99
7423
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 639
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: A case for Tru-Start

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mickey Whaley View Post
You are right Charlie I run motorcycles only but I can run my dial in the people I see here have never won a damn thing see if NHRA changes anything for you CHARLIE ????????
Changes for me??? None that would matter. I bracket race at several tracks that already have or will have tru-start in use in 2017. All of our big $ races use it. Bottom bulb, foot brake, shoe polish dials, you know, bracket racing. The big difference between S/SS and bracket racing is the size of the ego.
7423 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2016, 05:09 PM   #100
Spring Fling
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times in 6 Posts
Default Re: A case for Tru-Start

Class Racer's are very passionate about Stock and Super Stock as seen in this topic and others in the past.

Peter and I felt it was time to level the playing field at our Spring Fling events and thought it was time to make this worst red light change. While this scenario (double red) may only play out say in 1-1.5% of all "top bulb" pairs that is still needed to be changed. When timing systems were first built they only had the ability to see the first red, so that's why we see it this way decades later.

We also want to see Bracket Racing stay as healthy and cost effective as possible as the ets are getting quicker and quicker. With this change we felt that it could possibly get the cost down long term with a more level playing field.

I totally realize that Stock and Super Stock are performance based classes and that the change to these classes might be a little tougher but I feel that it's for the better of the classes long term.

Let's take Stock for instance. There has been a big change over the past decade with the influx of factory stock cars. I'm sure some will debate this but for the most part these cars are faster and more consistent then your traditional "muscle cars". At Indy this year at the US Nationals the ave handicap in Stock first round was 1.32 seconds in the 64 pairs contested. This will only get bigger over the next decade and I feel that a small change like this will only help the class long term.

Thanks for listening and good luck to all.
-Kyle Seipel
Spring Fling is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.