|
![]() |
#31 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Kilgore TX
Posts: 535
Likes: 8
Liked 274 Times in 105 Posts
|
![]()
A new class, "Factory Back Half"
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Crete, IL
Posts: 167
Likes: 260
Liked 54 Times in 24 Posts
|
![]()
Aside from the debate on tire size and back-half. It was brought up about Ford and Mopar cylinder head program.
I think that is partially to blame for lack of new interest in P/S. As much as I like the DRCE and Hemi 06 engines, they do not interest the young street guy...The demographic the Pro Stock used to play too. If there is change in Pro Stock, it would be imperative to utilize OEM engine design that the street crowd could relate to and have pride in.
__________________
Todd Gross 3323 FS/E,F |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Liked 22 Times in 22 Posts
|
![]()
I agree, but it still puts more people on the outside looking in.
__________________
don,t have one |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 | |
Live Reporter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Dripping Springs, Tx
Posts: 2,709
Likes: 186
Liked 520 Times in 132 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Ed Carpenter 2005 Chevy Cobalt A/SM Race Engine Development |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#35 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,110
Likes: 1,570
Liked 1,811 Times in 412 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
We were told how the new cars were going to bring in all this "new, young blood", and yet, it hasn't happened. You have a few guys who have the resources to buy and race the cars, and most of them were already racing. The new cars should have brought these "young street guys" people keep talking about, but they didn't. Trying to make Pro Stock into a class for the new cars won't bring the "young street guys" in, either. The "young street guy" is never going to care about Pro Stock. Pro Stock is a hard core racers class, only hard core racers and hard core fans will ever really care about it. For years, I worked in a shop that did work for all sorts of customers. I still, in my own business, do work for a broad range of people. I can tell you that around 95 out of 100 of today's "young car enthusiasts" do not give a damn about classes with "all those stupid rules". They care no more about Pro Stock than they do about Stock Eliminator and Super Stock, and you're not going to convert even 10% of them without wholesale changes to the classes, from Stock Eliminator on up. Changes that completely replace the character and style of the classes as they are now. Make Pro Stock a healthy class for the hard core racer and fan, and then you can draw a small percentage in, and convert them to hard core. NHRA started letting the bodies get out of control around 1977 when people were "drooping" the front clip. It went down hill rapidly from there, just like when NASCAR started with all the goofy body rules, instead of making the teams run a body in white. Now both NHRA Pro Stock and NASCAR cars look like blobs with no character. That's the first trend to reverse completely, in the next year or two. Then, with some common sense rules, they can reign in some of the over the top money in the engines. Doing that might even make it possible for some of the stuff Ford and Mopar already have to be competitive. One 1350 cfm throttle body for the fuel injection system. Pull the maximum bore size back. There are several easily policed rule changes that can get the class back under control. Make them look exactly like the current production street cars, with the exception of a reasonable scoop, and 14"x32" tires, and reign in the out of control engine insanity, then you might have a car the fans like and identify, the teams can afford to race, and the factories can support. Otherwise, you can create a new class, call it Pro Stock, drive off most of the current shrinking support it does have, and wonder why no one else showed up. NHRA got a good start on that for 2016.
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#36 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: phoenix
Posts: 1,486
Likes: 66
Liked 704 Times in 281 Posts
|
![]()
9 inch tire is the equalizer. Over powering the track will get a lot of aborted runs but when its race time everyone will race the track and detune enough to get down it. If some of the lower HP cars are around they may benefit with having a 9 tire racing against a over HP cars. That way you may not have to keep re factoring some cars and get the weight out of control. My under HP 10.5 racing no prep has made my middle of the pack car capable of winning as I'm throwing everything at it and hooking while others with to much HP have to de tune down to my level. Makes racing equal and closer racing. Thanks to running Super Stock for years and getting suspension science figured out.
I know a lot of you look down on no prep but the fans come and being a equalizer helps car count. I think that is the goal correct? And the fans didn't come out yesterday to watch cars crash. If they did they were disappointed as nobody crashed and racing was very close with a lot of different model cars and different power adders. Last edited by Jeff Stout; 11-27-2016 at 01:17 PM. Reason: more |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#37 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#38 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
See how many entrees you get if you make FS/XX a 16 car field compared to a pro stock field. compete this at a few more national events with the same rules and you will have double the cars trying to qualify then you do at a pro stock race.
If you turn this into a big tire stock body pro stock class, you will get the same participation and TV audence that you have now for Pro Stock. Let pro Stock die on the vine. Its a dying class and concept. Just watching bodies with a Chevrolet sticker on it make boring passes down the track is played out. For all the " Its to dangerous to race on a 9 tire " crowd how many crashes have we had? These cars weigh 3500 pounds and have a long wheelbase. These cars are pretty stable going down the track at 8.30's and 8.10's other than launches with the spinning and long wheelies at times the cars get down pretty regularly on National Event prepped tracks. If this really comes true, why not run it in XX form and same rules. See how it goes from there. Let the Pro Stock guys run Pro Mod, or adapt, their show is what is dying and not popular with the fans and that's why there is a discussion for a change. Last edited by Todd Hoven; 11-27-2016 at 03:05 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#39 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,110
Likes: 1,570
Liked 1,811 Times in 412 Posts
|
![]()
Okay, at this point, this has devolved into guys, including myself, who don't race a class, not just trying to adjust rules for a class that we don't race, but either suggesting wholesale changes, wiping the class out completely and starting over, or just plain suggesting letting the class die, and screw the guys who run it. That's just bad form, and totally uncool, I'm out of this.
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#40 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Punta Gorda Isles, Fl.
Posts: 1,626
Likes: 3,403
Liked 779 Times in 209 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
"Pistol" Pete Dutko |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|