|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Depending on piston speed, a gapless top ring can be a benefit, or become a detriment.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,473
Likes: 632
Liked 1,987 Times in 599 Posts
|
![]()
I tried the gapless top ring and my results were not good. I went back to the standard .043 top ring.
__________________
Mike Pearson 2485 SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Liked 22 Times in 22 Posts
|
![]()
It is a strange deal. We always picked up a little with them, but it's hit or miss. Some people absolutely won't run them. I won't run without them. Now, I've tried the gapless second and would never recommend that.
__________________
don,t have one |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
|
![]()
Randy, how wide (thick) non-gapless ring were you testing that against? Nobody runs .043" anymore, do they? .023" & .028" is what I hear most about anymore. Do they make gapless rings that thin now?
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Liked 22 Times in 22 Posts
|
![]()
No, they don't make them that thin as far as I know. Our last Dart Buick had the real thin package, and I know they were not gapless. Someone else may know different, but I think the super thin rings are gapped. I still run quite a few .043 rings, in fact the only thin ring engine we've done was the Dart Buick. My experience with two ring, .043 top, then low tension oil ring, and .043, ,043, 3 mm, and the 3 ring thin stuff all pulled about the same vac at 20" with a wet sump. There's something there with the thin ring, but quite expensive. My saying is if the super thin rings beat ya, you're real close to kicking their ***. We ran gapless in all the .043 stuff.
__________________
don,t have one |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Black Creek, BC Canada
Posts: 331
Likes: 80
Liked 172 Times in 81 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
conventional file fit, 5/64, 5/64, 3/16. Ran good, no oiling issues. (.060 over) as above except .043 top with gas ported spacer, slowed down about .07, no oiling issues. (.070 over) Gapless top, picked back up but now oils the plugs. (.080 over) All were run with napier second, low drag oil ring. This is a low rpm, under carbed combo so may not be the real world with a high rpm setup. Jim Mantle V/SA 6632 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|