|
|
![]() |
#1 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arkansas - In the middle of everything.
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 64
Liked 780 Times in 194 Posts
|
![]()
The 1966 and 1967 casting numbers are announced today on www.nhraracer.com
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,494
Likes: 3,600
Liked 7,734 Times in 1,739 Posts
|
![]()
Dwight, please explain to me just how a combo can be raced for YEARS without an approved intake manifold number in the guide? And what about the 65 cars?
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm not spending 100K to win 2K |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 384
Likes: 101
Liked 419 Times in 85 Posts
|
![]()
They finally put the 252 manifold in the books after tearing me down for the 10-15th time with my 65 car. There were no intake numbers before that. I don't see why the manifolds are not approved from 64-68 they are all the same with different casting numbers. The early manifolds have the 5/16 bolt holes, though.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 494
Likes: 6
Liked 25 Times in 16 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Billy, move over, you have company in the one year only intake manifold combo. Everything I found online said the 2536560 p/n was the part number, not the casting number. Well, at least I have the casting to look for. I haven't seen one yet.
__________________
Mopar 2 Ya! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 494
Likes: 6
Liked 25 Times in 16 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Mopar 2 Ya! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,168
Likes: 487
Liked 346 Times in 126 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
See if you can get a hold of Galen Govier to see if he can clear up this mess between casting numbers and part numbers |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 494
Likes: 6
Liked 25 Times in 16 Posts
|
![]()
I don't know how to get in touch with Galen. I'm not sure if his white book is a better reference than the Chrysler parts book. I'm thinking no. At this point I'll just try to find any 2bbl intake, preferably the 559 casting. I think that is the correct one. Like Paul said, it would make sense if they made all of them legal. I have a line on a 1971 single plane for a reasonable price, but my battery on my truck needed replaced. I got that done today, got the truck inspected as well. I'll try to pick it up after I get back from the Gators. Just going on Thursday as far as I know. The college where I teach is closed next week for Spring Break. I hope it doesn't rain next week.
__________________
Mopar 2 Ya! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 572
Likes: 39
Liked 53 Times in 38 Posts
|
![]()
I have a 65 Plymouth with a 273-2 barrel, single plane type. I can get the number tomorrow. I think the casting number is one number off the part number, don't know which way. Too bad Chrysler didn't do a 273 4 barrel on the b-bodys, I'd be tempted to race that car. The 273 feels more powerful than a 318.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|