HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-02-2017, 12:55 PM   #11
ALMACK
VIP Member
 
ALMACK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,927
Likes: 121
Liked 347 Times in 123 Posts
Default Re: Suggestion for New Pure Stockers

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Yacavone View Post
You want the car in the other lane to have real radial slicks, but not you?
Of course he'll have lane choice too.
Better think this one through again.
Some of these new DOT drag radials work pretty good Mark.
The only dis advantage is the weight.
On a 9 sec. stocker the slicks might be better, but there are 7 and 8 second street cars running DOT radials.

I already run DOT legal M/T drag radials on my T-Bird Stocker at NHRA events.
It runs low 12's and the car runs almost the same with 30 inch bias ply slicks or 28 in. M/T DOT drag radials.
__________________
Alan Mackin Stock 3777/ SS 3377
P/SA & SS/PA Fox Thunderbird
I/PS '95 Mustang GT

Last edited by ALMACK; 04-02-2017 at 12:58 PM.
ALMACK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2017, 01:48 PM   #12
Mark Yacavone
Veteran Member
 
Mark Yacavone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,742
Likes: 2,844
Liked 5,002 Times in 1,902 Posts
Default Re: Suggestion for New Pure Stockers

Quote:
Originally Posted by ALMACK View Post
Some of these new DOT drag radials work pretty good Mark.
The only dis advantage is the weight.
On a 9 sec. stocker the slicks might be better, but there are 7 and 8 second street cars running DOT radials.

I already run DOT legal M/T drag radials on my T-Bird Stocker at NHRA events.
It runs low 12's and the car runs almost the same with 30 inch bias ply slicks or 28 in. M/T DOT drag radials.
Go for it then .
7 and 8 second street cars are not "bracket racing".
Tricky DOT's cost almost as much as real slicks, don't they?
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers
Mark Yacavone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2017, 06:36 PM   #13
ALMACK
VIP Member
 
ALMACK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,927
Likes: 121
Liked 347 Times in 123 Posts
Default Re: Suggestion for New Pure Stockers

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Yacavone View Post
Go for it then .
7 and 8 second street cars are not "bracket racing".
Tricky DOT's cost almost as much as real slicks, don't they?
They all cost the same
__________________
Alan Mackin Stock 3777/ SS 3377
P/SA & SS/PA Fox Thunderbird
I/PS '95 Mustang GT
ALMACK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2017, 10:07 PM   #14
Dan Fahey
VIP Member
 
Dan Fahey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,126
Likes: 1,084
Liked 184 Times in 113 Posts
Default Re: Suggestion for New Pure Stockers

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Woods View Post
I agree with certain suggestions on this subject.The proper training is paramount to the full enforcement of the class rules.I believe there is not a tech man in any sanctioning body that doesn't want to do the best job that they can.Pure stock is the one class with the most stringent rules by far.There always seems to be plenty of people that can set back and tell everyone how bad the tech ppl are.Well why don't you go to the head of the line and become an official and tech person? Class RACING needs your expertise now more than ever.It's going to take all involved to keep s/ss alive as we know it.I feel I can say this due to have given 7 yrs. to trying to keep a level and fair playing field.in all classes by enforcing the the rules as written. So the next time you talk with a tech person or race official.why don't you thank them instead of talking trash.They are there out of the love of the sport ,without them there would not be an event.Good luck to all in 2017 and may the win lights be plentiful in your lane.
Jim Woods --- former IHRA tech.
X2 Jim
As a Soccer Ref..when hear complaining about our Referee Staff.
I mention there are plenty of employment opportunities for those that think they can do a better job!

D
Dan Fahey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2017, 10:32 PM   #15
efi v6
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Suggestion for New Pure Stockers

Mark,
You needed to look at #1 stock oem size wheels - just easier to get a good sticky tire for larger wheels in a drag radial. As far as working good i took a lot of lunch money off of guys with slicks to my drag radials but any way just some thoughts on getting more people involved in class racing. Go to a test and tune or street night i do not know were you are but here in this area New Jersey the lanes are full of late model muscle cars just looking to get involve in something more competitive.
Tony K.
efi v6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2017, 10:55 PM   #16
Dan Fahey
VIP Member
 
Dan Fahey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,126
Likes: 1,084
Liked 184 Times in 113 Posts
Default Re: Suggestion for New Pure Stockers

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Yacavone View Post
You want the car in the other lane to have real radial slicks, but not you?
Of course he'll have lane choice too.
Better think this one through again.
Tires are a sorted out issue. No need to relitigate.

The real issue is teching a new Pure Stocker.
Remember a few decades ago some new Cadillac FWD cars set their respective national records.
Ordered to tear down the owners had no idea how to do that.
They had to get a Caddy specialist (then rare) over to pull it apart for inspection, then reassemble!

Teching our cars is about adjudicating fair play.
This is why we need to talk and come up with solutions!
Not only to expand Pure Stock but like a Jim said .. S/SS especially for the future.

D
Dan Fahey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2017, 10:59 PM   #17
Mark Yacavone
Veteran Member
 
Mark Yacavone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,742
Likes: 2,844
Liked 5,002 Times in 1,902 Posts
Default Re: Suggestion for New Pure Stockers

Quote:
Originally Posted by efi v6 View Post
Mark,
You needed to look at #1 stock oem size wheels - just easier to get a good sticky tire for larger wheels in a drag radial. As far as working good i took a lot of lunch money off of guys with slicks to my drag radials but any way just some thoughts on getting more people involved in class racing. Go to a test and tune or street night i do not know were you are but here in this area New Jersey the lanes are full of late model muscle cars just looking to get involve in something more competitive.
Tony K.
That's all good, Tony
If you want to run DOT's , great...but don't take away your option, when the guy in the other lane doesn't have the same restriction.
Next, we'll take up the stock converter business.
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers

Last edited by Mark Yacavone; 04-02-2017 at 11:08 PM.
Mark Yacavone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2017, 04:00 PM   #18
Dan Fahey
VIP Member
 
Dan Fahey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,126
Likes: 1,084
Liked 184 Times in 113 Posts
Default Re: Suggestion for New Pure Stockers

I see that NHRA has set up a new Class Requirements they call Pure Stock.

Designed to help track requirements for the new super cars that go quicker than 11.50 ET.
By passing the need for a mandatory Roll Bar.

The new cars have a much better frame.
Some come have a Built in Roll Bar to meet sport car and autocross track requirements.

This is one of the conversations that has to be resolved.
A/PS minimum is 12.05 a full second under is 11.05 sec.
Well set up car in Mineshaft conditions could get a car well below that.

I can see inviting some turbo and supercharged smaller engines.
Most aspirated cars could fit below the current 11.50 et.

Again how do you fit these cars in?
Most likely approve a few at a time.
Select a couple each Ford, Chrysler and GM and grow from there.
Again would need serious support from these car makers to give up specs and collaborate with IHRA.

This is where we need help on who to contact.
Maybe get NMCA to help a bit to expand their race series.
BTW who would be that person at NMCA?

Dan
Dan Fahey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2017, 06:04 PM   #19
efi v6
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Suggestion for New Pure Stockers

Dan,
I would start with the cars that are already listed in the NHRA guide.
2010,2015 camaro ss, 2011-2014 mustang 3.7 V6 and the GT ,challenger
etc. I think all they are missing are oem cam specs. As far as NMCA you could try Gene Bergstrom (technical ) 714--460-3813 e-mail gbergstrom@promediapub.com
Tony K.
efi v6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2017, 06:53 PM   #20
Matt Welker
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Clear Spring, MD
Posts: 193
Likes: 1,421
Liked 77 Times in 15 Posts
Default Re: Suggestion for New Pure Stockers

What is the HP rating, if it is even in the IHRA guide for a 2017 Mustang GT, 5.0? What class would it for, index, and weight?

I can't seem to figure this out for IHRA.

Interest in running this combo at s/ss combo races, maybe an IHRA event. Looking into a PS option for local combo races and really just wondering if it can run under the index almost bone stock.

Matt
__________________
Matt Welker
Stock 1741, SS/AH 114
www.facebook.com/welkerracing

Last edited by Matt Welker; 04-03-2017 at 06:55 PM.
Matt Welker is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.