|
![]() |
#31 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 91
Likes: 8
Liked 3 Times in 1 Post
|
![]()
I worked in a GM Dealership Parts Dept. The parts book showed both in the diagrams. The louver difference was early and late production. I wish I still had my old parts book that I could scan. I think the change was in Mar of 68
And after I typed this I read the difference was Big Block vs Small Block Cars. But my parts book did not read that way. Last edited by Wayne W; 04-04-2017 at 11:06 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,818
Likes: 2,909
Liked 5,126 Times in 1,954 Posts
|
![]()
Me neither, Ed , and I had at least two of the cars in question.
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,422
Likes: 529
Liked 333 Times in 180 Posts
|
![]()
67 cars got the fins---ALL 68 bb cars got the planter louvers--68 sbc cars got the fins til mid year then ALL big or small block cars got the planter style louvers---ALL 69 cars got the same planter louvers no difference whether big or small block engines-FED387
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,818
Likes: 2,909
Liked 5,126 Times in 1,954 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
So, only way to get a 350 or 396 in 67 , is as an SS, right? Jim Hawkins would have to change the hood to run a 350..At least it used to be that way. Today, who knows?
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#35 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
f rom CHEVROLET MOTOR DIVISION august 1971 edition----group 8.000 hood panel---68 chevelle [exc ss] #3940657. ss #3940660 69 chevelle [exc 396] #3940631 396 #3940632. the difference between 68&69 hoods is the location of one of the hinge bolt holes. the 68&69 hood grilles are the same part#.in 68 the ss cars were a separate model #13827 sport cp #13867 conv. in 69 there was no separate model ss just a ss pkg line item option like ac auto trans. etc . as the above part #'s state was part of the 396 pkg added to the base malibu.the copo 427 option wasnt listed in the parts book but when we built one for a/s in 1974 we had to run the 396 hood. the67-69 camaro flat hood #3938617 is listed[exc.350-396] 67 camaro #3909158 w/350-396. 68-9 #3938619 350-396 exc spec ducted hood.hope this helps. this part # info isnt from some reprint book,but a real gm hand me down from crivelli in 1972
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#36 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Verrry South Jersey
Posts: 537
Likes: 134
Liked 251 Times in 125 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#37 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 494
Likes: 6
Liked 25 Times in 16 Posts
|
![]()
Does that mean the 1968 Hemi SS hoods are legal on the 1968 Darts and Barracudas? Do they have to be fiberglass, or can they be carbon fiber replicas? I think that would be nice to have with a 273 2bbl. That might motivate me to change from the 1966 Dart to a 1968.☺
__________________
Mopar 2 Ya! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#38 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: phoenix
Posts: 1,486
Likes: 66
Liked 704 Times in 281 Posts
|
![]()
Is a flat hood correct for 88 Olds Vista Cruiser? Just making sure Im legal
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#39 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 884
Likes: 207
Liked 310 Times in 174 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#40 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: phoenix
Posts: 1,486
Likes: 66
Liked 704 Times in 281 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|