|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 476
Likes: 20
Liked 70 Times in 22 Posts
|
![]()
Please explain how a plane stays in level flight with zero lift. Would think it would need lift equal to its weight.
__________________
Stewart Way 2424 SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 3,047
Likes: 712
Liked 1,606 Times in 584 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
There are four forces that keep the airplane; thrust, weight, lift and drag. Thrust, like any other object, keeps and maintains the forward motion. Weight maintains the center of gravity or the center of mass so the airplane can fly as close to level as its design, minimizing the aircraft controls input. Its correlation is to thrust for its forward motion. Drag, as any other object in motion is always there and the airplane, like any other vehicle, is designed to reduce the drag by reducing its footprint or coefficient of drag. Lift is dependent of the airflow around the object as it moves forward due to thrust. There are other variables such as the shape of the object and weight. In the case of an airplane, the air moves around the wings give and maintain the airplane lift. Zero lift is a term used in flight dynamics science in which during level flight there is an equilibrium of the yaw, pitch and roll axis during flight which is also known as leveled wings or Zero bank angle. In this configuration, the forces are balanced for optimum aircraft performance and operation. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Yeah, but how much faster would that airplane run the 1/4 mile in if it was 10% lighter and more aerodynamic? Because that is what we are talking about here with the camaro vs vette. Same engine
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 143
Likes: 3
Liked 80 Times in 29 Posts
|
![]()
It's difficult to debate the Corvette's need for some significant and immediate factor assistance.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Where the Green Grass Grows, AL
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
If the ego contest of Camaro racers had been kept in check, it would still be at the 305 it was originally rated at. The vette has been 345 from the beginning, even when the Camaro was 305. They wouldn't lower the vette back then, when no one could figure out how to get one down the track, so the reverse argument holds no water now. If you want to complain about the factor on the f-body cars, there are plenty of racers that helped get it there, same as a whole lot of other combos that aren't as good as they once were. The AHFS exists to prevent "pencil whipping" a combo to death. It's not perfect, but it's the rules we race under. Think it should be changed? Talk to NHRA
__________________
Chad Rhodes 2113 I/SA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
I enjoy my ridiculously under-factored car. I just want to point out a few things some people don't realize is happening. The Factory cars get crap all the time about their factors.Its time some traditional cars get the spotlight. And what better car than someone who is asking for it with "The Baddest B Stocker in the Country", when its really a AA Stocker Hate to break it to this guy, but 9.80 only gets you 0.90 under the AA/SA index. Which is where the Vette, at that weight, would be with the same factoring as the same engine in the other lane. Last edited by Kenny Boy; 04-27-2017 at 12:12 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 541
Likes: 11
Liked 20 Times in 14 Posts
|
![]()
If everything equal, rear gear, trans,same fluids, etc and both leave the line exactly the same way, hit the shift points exactly at the same time, etc etc, the et's will be almost the identical!!!!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
I guess we will have to wait another year to see who is the Baddest B/SA.
I don't Think "God's Gift to the LS1" will grace us with his presence this year even though he is still entered. All you other fools with your low power engines will have to fight it out for Second place in the hearts and minds of everyone. We all know if he was here, you wouldn't even be in B. Can't wait to see whos gets to hold the Fake Crown this year. I can already see the relief on some competitors faces, Thankful he spared them this year. Last edited by Kenny Boy; 08-27-2017 at 06:25 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Liked 21 Times in 7 Posts
|
![]()
The winner of class at Indy is the baddest to anyone who has been around in this sport. You will one day see, the rest is just talk and nonsense.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Fishers Indiana
Posts: 64
Likes: 9
Liked 26 Times in 11 Posts
|
![]()
[QUOTE=Kenny Boy;542879]I guess we will have to wait another year to see who is the Baddest B/SA.
I don't Think "God's Gift to the LS1" will grace us with his presence this year even though he is still entered. All you other fools with your low power engines will have to fight it out for Second place in the hearts and minds of everyone. We all know if he was here, you wouldn't even be in B. Can't wait to see whos gets to hold the Fake Crown this year. I can already see the relief on some competitors faces, Thankful he spared them this year.[/QUOT Hmmm Kenny are you entered in Indy or do you even have a car ? lol I think you are a Keyboard racer hope your finger tips don't get worn out |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|