|
|
![]() |
#1 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,229
Likes: 133
Liked 535 Times in 110 Posts
|
![]()
Just say "no".....to aftermarket heads.
__________________
Jim Kaekel 3836 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Elysburg, Pa
Posts: 733
Likes: 361
Liked 327 Times in 121 Posts
|
![]()
I could be wrong but I don't think it is practical to use the Edelbrock head on the Max Wedge, the port mismatch would be quite a challenge since you cant enlarge the ports. If they raise the iron head HP to the aluminum head HP the factor would be higher than the original.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 27
Likes: 5
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
Guys you are missing the point here.
Aftermarket heads are already accepted with a HP penalty. There is talk that they will become "replacement" heads and this result will eliminate the different factors of OEM vs. Aftermarket heads for the combos that currently have them. Trying to find out "if" this does go through, what will happen to the two hp factors that are currently different? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arkansas - In the middle of everything.
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 64
Liked 780 Times in 194 Posts
|
![]()
Conceptually, when you place a different hp factor on an engine because of the use of replacement heads (aftermarket or OEM), you have essentially created a new engine for the books. The problem is the way that classification is calculated since it uses a weight break of one rating and then the weight of the new hp factor. Eliminating the differential of ratings will simplify the calculation for the guys in the field, which is always a good thing since it helps eliminate confusion and mistakes.
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Sun Valley,Ca
Posts: 86
Likes: 2
Liked 12 Times in 6 Posts
|
![]()
So does this mean that if a combination has been factored 20 HP now its gonna go back to the OG HP rating??
Example 396 Iron head is 375/385 396 Alum head is rated at 405HP Both heads go back to 375? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cumming GA
Posts: 1,992
Likes: 1,293
Liked 1,436 Times in 299 Posts
|
![]()
It makes sense to me that there would not be a penalty in superstock. heads can be modified extensively. Stockers should keep the penalty for the aftermarket heads. My opinion anyway.
__________________
James Schaechter 3163 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 964
Likes: 341
Liked 163 Times in 53 Posts
|
![]()
5hp off only for aftermarket head.....
__________________
Stephen Johnson #2162 Horace Johnson #2167 SS/D 427 Ford Fairlane NHRA-IHRA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Indianola Washington
Posts: 406
Likes: 0
Liked 456 Times in 148 Posts
|
![]()
Does Edelbrock then make a SBC head with intake runners 161-165 CC's? Edelbrock is the only approved head? All I have seen is 180 CC and up.
Steve Teeter STK 6380. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Georgia
Posts: 158
Likes: 2
Liked 31 Times in 10 Posts
|
![]()
One of the listed heads is close in CC to the stock specs. This rule is good for guys in the cylinder head business. Now we need a head approved for the Pontiac.
__________________
Michael Brand II 505B - F/SA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 1,084
Liked 184 Times in 113 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|