|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 572
Likes: 39
Liked 53 Times in 38 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,818
Likes: 2,909
Liked 5,126 Times in 1,954 Posts
|
![]()
Rich said his car weighed 3418. One would assume that's with the driver weight added. So, the 170 needs to be removed to find the natural factor for the car. Then you would adjust to the lightest possible weight for that class. Then add the the driver weight for the total weight with the 2 bbl .combo.
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NS CANADA
Posts: 892
Likes: 1,637
Liked 393 Times in 153 Posts
|
![]()
I’m still wrapping my head around the 350cfm for the 305 2bbl and 500cfm for the 350 2bbl.
302 is 287cfm and 351 is 356cfm. Only wish Ford had 350cfm on the 302. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,496
Likes: 3,600
Liked 7,771 Times in 1,741 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
69-70 350s use "really big" 2bbl, about 400 CFM. All other 350s use "big" 2bbl at about 350 CFM. FFFFord put 350 CFM carb on 82 manual trans Mustang GTs only.
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm not spending 100K to win 2K |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|