|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]()
I have a question for whoever dreamed up the need for replacement heads for SBC engines. How do you think it is easier to find a 624 head for a 1986 350 truck than a 1979 Chevy car with a 350? How did you determine 62-79 SBC are the only engines affected? I also like to know how we are going to shrink an intake runner from 185cc to 172cc legally? MERRY CHRISTMAS & HAPPY NEW YEAR
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Live Reporter
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: New Bern, NC
Posts: 3,467
Likes: 146
Liked 3,363 Times in 731 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
James Williamson W200 J/SA. SS/JA |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 44
Likes: 4
Liked 79 Times in 7 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
What he said but it's 165 or less 🤔🤔 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]()
Better yet how about shrinking them down to 140 ccs. The new replacement heads are legal on early 327's with the 520 and 896 heads. What??????
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 103
Likes: 79
Liked 12 Times in 6 Posts
|
![]()
The 520 and 896 heads were used in 62-63-64 on the 327/250 and also on the 283 2bbl and 4bbl.
Last edited by Timetraveler; 12-24-2017 at 09:18 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]()
Yeah the 62 327/250hp has 1.72 intake valves as well. I don't even think the best cylinder head guru on the planet could shrink 185cc runners to 140cc , not to mention 2.02 valve to 1.72 legally...lol
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|