|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Charlevoix, MI
Posts: 453
Likes: 115
Liked 127 Times in 49 Posts
|
![]()
That's what I'm understanding. The air flow is going to be restricted by the intake regardless, so with the larger head runners i don't think it'll help that much.
__________________
Bobby Lundholm 3516 G/SA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Lakewood Washington
Posts: 1,407
Likes: 29
Liked 237 Times in 126 Posts
|
![]()
That's what I was told regarding my AFRs. Smaller valves would degrade the heads performance. The shop that does work for Hancock and Lane advised against that route.
__________________
Dale Shearon 68 Mustang 6394 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
|
![]()
I know of at least one stocker 428 CJ intake manifold that is 10 lbs lighter in wt. than any others. No grinding on the outside either !
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Charlevoix, MI
Posts: 453
Likes: 115
Liked 127 Times in 49 Posts
|
![]()
I still don't think you make the intakes big enough to really let the heads breathe. What's the standard CC of the stock Chevy intakes compared to a 185 cc head runner?
__________________
Bobby Lundholm 3516 G/SA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|