|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 409
Likes: 295
Liked 117 Times in 50 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 409
Likes: 295
Liked 117 Times in 50 Posts
|
![]()
At a race weight of 3770 for the '92, it looks like it would take about 325 horsepower or so from a truck 5.8EFI, just to make the 13.15 O/SA index. And that's a lot of air to push at 100 mph or so. The stock heads are pretty horrific on those things, especially the exhaust port, and I don't see any replacement heads listed for the Stock classes.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 569
Likes: 36
Liked 50 Times in 35 Posts
|
![]()
Put shag carpet, port holes, fender flairs and wide tires on it and if its a rockn don't come knockn.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,927
Likes: 121
Liked 347 Times in 123 Posts
|
![]()
I looked at that van combo years ago.
The 1991 351W combo looks like a natural Q or R/SA. Bunch of different ways you can go with a van. The 1992 models with a 351W has a natural P/SA combo. Somehow, I believe pushing a brick like that to a 13.45 @ 4,010 lbs. might be a struggle
__________________
Alan Mackin Stock 3777/ SS 3377 P/SA & SS/PA Fox Thunderbird I/PS '95 Mustang GT |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,742
Likes: 2,846
Liked 5,003 Times in 1,903 Posts
|
![]()
Hope this is a joke..as in hilarious.
I suppose it would give new meaning to the idea of "putting a wheel on somebody". As far as driver position , I can think of much better "vehicles". Oh, I don't know. Maybe something like a ...Corvette?
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 409
Likes: 295
Liked 117 Times in 50 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
And the humor aspect of it is more interesting than the viability aspect of it, but if it was an advantageous combo, I absolutely would consider it. Of course, anything that you and Billy agree on, I would consider. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Greater Boston
Posts: 1,491
Likes: 1,081
Liked 882 Times in 188 Posts
|
![]()
Well at least it's aerodynamic...
__________________
Bob Don 128 SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 409
Likes: 295
Liked 117 Times in 50 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
But the 300(4.9) EFI inline 6 is factored 40 horsepower above Ford's claimed horsepower. The 302(5.0) and 351W(5.8) EFI engines are only factored 30 horsepower above Ford's claimed horsepower, and are better-supported by the aftermarket. On the plus side, you can pretty much get the things for free, and you can sleep four in your race car at the track. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Liked 28 Times in 15 Posts
|
![]()
On the serious side --- this combo offers the worst front / rear weight distribution AND the worst aero that I can imagine!!! So you can be slowest in 60 feet and at the finish line!!! Makes my Comanche look like a rocket ship!!
1051 R/SA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NS CANADA
Posts: 836
Likes: 1,312
Liked 322 Times in 124 Posts
|
![]()
Last year I asked for hp off the 300 as 190hp is too high, was denied. I had a 92 f150 with the 300/aod/3.08 rear gear that while slow bracket racing, was deadly consistent and went a LOT of rounds. Instead of my longbox, I thought a short box and gearing/converter/hp off, etc would put it closer to the index/make it viable.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|