|
![]() |
#11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: nhranumbers.com
Posts: 875
Likes: 136
Liked 164 Times in 51 Posts
|
![]()
I must be getting old.... So the 1968 car will make it to C/SA BUT the 1969 will not because of the 25 lbs difference in shipping weight. Is that correct?
__________________
Glen DeMenge 1969 Camaro Stock Eliminator Last edited by MEXJOE; 07-06-2018 at 10:25 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Chesterfield, Va
Posts: 160
Likes: 236
Liked 77 Times in 39 Posts
|
![]()
Yes 68 camaro 350 hp came with automatic I've switched back and forth 325 to 350 hp over the years
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 1 Post
|
![]()
What do run? Where have you won? What records have you set? Have you ever even made a pass down a track? Looks like you only get on here to bash someone or their work. You like calling out names, how about you call out yours. How about you climb in a class and see how well you do.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 377
Likes: 98
Liked 400 Times in 79 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
So the bottom line is the guide is full of cars that miss a class by 5 pounds. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: columbus, georgia
Posts: 380
Likes: 57
Liked 297 Times in 84 Posts
|
![]()
I believed for years that Chevrolet never put a solid lifter motor in front of an automatic until '69 but somewhere along the way the '68 Chevelle with the 375/396 was allowed to run with an automatic, maybe Dwight can fill us in on when that happened.
My car misses the 11lb break by 2 lbs @ 10.99. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: nhranumbers.com
Posts: 875
Likes: 136
Liked 164 Times in 51 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
I see the shipping weight diffidence now, as I was unaware of this fact. It is interesting. Thank you for your clear guidance on this topic.
__________________
Glen DeMenge 1969 Camaro Stock Eliminator |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 341
Likes: 0
Liked 55 Times in 14 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,066
Likes: 1,487
Liked 1,630 Times in 378 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
If only you actually had a grasp on the facts............. ![]()
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 341
Likes: 0
Liked 55 Times in 14 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,066
Likes: 1,487
Liked 1,630 Times in 378 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Yeah, well what you don't see, or grasp, is that NHRA officials told Jimmy his car was legal to run SS/B after they added HP to that combination because he was going too fast in SS/C (he alone pushed the combination well below 0.85 under) and after he set the record, in Bowling Green, in August. So, you falsely accused Jimmy of making up rules. Jimmy asked NHRA if the additional HP made his car legal to run SS/B, and NHRA told him yes, and passed it through tech as being legal. Oh, the reason the NHRA official told Jimmy he could move was because the HP was put on the combination strictly by him, so that official said that the HP was on the aluminum heads, because Jimmy had only run the aluminum heads and he was the only one running the combination. Funny, Dallas Kelly never complained about Jimmy running SS/B. Neither did A.H. Adkins. Neither did Steve Kent or J. Allen Sherman. The hitters in SS/B never seemed to be bothered by Jimmy Bridges being in the class with them.
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S Last edited by Alan Roehrich; 07-09-2018 at 07:11 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|