|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
The only reason it was not in stock when it came out, there was no weight break for it to fit into. There was no FS/AA class. I don't know, but i don't think the 5.4 combo is better than a 5.2 just because the sc is bigger. I also don’t think most will agree when you say most will agree...duh. Its in the guide so I don’t know what your point is. This thread is about ford giving then taking it back for un know reasons. I wish someone from ford would come on here and tells us why, is that to much to ask.
5.2 Combo bore 3.631 stroke 3.649 Piston- dome 12.5 CR Cam- .590 lift Throttle body- bigger than the 5.4 Valves- 2 -1.513 2 -1.285 RPM 9000 rpm+ supercharger 2.9 pulley size 3.25 inch ram air front entrance supercharger 5.4 Combo bore 3.553 stroke 4.166 piston- flat 10.5 cr cam- lift .473 Throttle body smaller than the 5.2 valves- 2 -1.462 2 -1.265 rpm 8200+ supercharger 4.0 pulley size 4 inch no ram air rear entrance super charger |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,855
Likes: 83
Liked 444 Times in 145 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Bruce Noland 1788 STK |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Same as you, I don't have car. I'm just a keyboard jockey with an opinion, whats your excuse.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,855
Likes: 83
Liked 444 Times in 145 Posts
|
![]()
Oh, but I do have a car and may back out this year after bad luck last year. You on the other hand..not so much.
__________________
Bruce Noland 1788 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Sponsor
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 139
Likes: 2
Liked 66 Times in 17 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Tom, Keyboard racer or not it looks like you do your homework on the specs. Not to many people do that, thank you! Jim D'Amore |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Sponsor
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 139
Likes: 2
Liked 66 Times in 17 Posts
|
![]()
http://nhraracer.com/content/general...342&zoneid=132
The link above takes you to NHRARacer website where it shows the 5.4L 4.0L combination was on the books for 2010 and 2012 engine combos approved for the showdown class. It was then removed by Mike D. after a few weeks. kdanner, it's plain and simple any time the HP in stock eliminator got above 500 HP both of those combinations became legal. The 2013 Cobra Jet came from the factory with 500 HP. By the end of the year it was already above 525 HP. So both of those engine combinations were legal in 2013. Jim D'Amore |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Live Reporter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hickory, Ky
Posts: 10,669
Likes: 1,961
Liked 10,846 Times in 2,254 Posts
|
![]()
It's NHRA's ball, bat , glove, and field!
Play Ball |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Sponsor
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 139
Likes: 2
Liked 66 Times in 17 Posts
|
![]()
I will be making several posts through out the day, then it will be up to Ken and the members of Class Racer to decide if they would like to have this thread locked up. It's going to start now...
Poking the bear came from Mike's mouth when I started pushing back. Quote:
that post was made 11-07-2017 A few short weeks after that Mike pulled Ford's 10 year sponsorship from Classracer.com. When I questioned Mike during our 3 hr meeting in Norwalk, OH a couple of weeks ago his exact words to me were he did not like the way he was being treated because of my post above. It showed he took it personal rather than thinking of what is good for Ford Motor Company and the members of Classracer.com. He was trying to hurt the site financially because of his personal feelings. Yet he continues to post about his stock/superstock association GLSSA. He receives financial gains from the GLSSA. First off my apologies were given to Ken M. for losing his Ford sponsorship because of my post. I've known Ken since 1999 when he started writing for the biggest Ford Magazine on the planet (Muscle Mustangs and Fast Fords.) He worked with MMFF for 15 years and in that time I've always known Ken to be one of Ford's biggest cheerleaders! Besides buying a new Ford vehicle every other year and racing an older Shelby Stocker for many years, he decided a few years back he was going to do what he needed to get in a new Cobra Jet. He worked out a deal with a fellow racer to purchase one of his 08' Cobra Jets and make payments on it so he could start racing stock while show casing Ford's best, the Cobra Jet. That is Ken's passion for Ford and because Mike got his personal feelings hurt he trampled on the dreams of a loyal, life long, Ford enthusiast. My guess is if Ken was racing a Mopar, classracer would still have a Ford Sponsorship. These are nothing but the facts, Jim D'Amore |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,855
Likes: 83
Liked 444 Times in 145 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Bruce Noland 1788 STK |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
|
![]()
Even if the engine is less capable it has a supercharger that is one liter bigger than anyone else...
If you want to talk about folks that took it in the rear, take a look at the N/A Shootout guys (All brands). I know of 5 other people as well as myself that built an N/A combo had it ready to race and they killed the class for blower only cars. Not to mention all the players that had established setups. I promise Bo had 100's of Thousands into his combo. He said in the Cobra jet video (On YouTube) he got a new engine each race, from his builder a few days before the race. Unfortunately we are like kids dealing with our parents, when racing. Just because they said it was "OK" for a split second but then changed their mind, we are stuck with the final decision. As upset as we get it’s their rules and it’s not changing unless they want it to.
__________________
Ross Gregory 5133 Stock,Super Stock 53 Top Dragster |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|