|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,125
Likes: 1,179
Liked 684 Times in 289 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Last edited by Mike Jones; 01-05-2019 at 07:49 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Glendora,Calif.
Posts: 1,136
Likes: 172
Liked 705 Times in 219 Posts
|
![]()
That white '62 is cool, but it has the dual 4 barrel 409 horse engine in it. Must be refactored to get it into G. The 380 horse I was thinking about was the single four barrel hi po engine released in '62 only. 63-65 engines were red at 400 horse at the factory, but the 62 380 was the same engine.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Glendora,Calif.
Posts: 1,136
Likes: 172
Liked 705 Times in 219 Posts
|
![]()
How 'bout a 68 Caprice Estate wagon with a 427/425 horse? What class does that monstrous thing fit and what does it weigh?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Texarkana Ark/TX
Posts: 2,446
Likes: 575
Liked 880 Times in 311 Posts
|
![]()
Mike in the specs it looks like they have upped the '62 380 HP 409 to 400 HP in '63 and allowed the optional carb and optional big cam from the 62. ..
Something interesting is the '62 380 HP-409 is factored @ 365 NHRA HP and the 2X4 409 HP-409is factored @ 370 NHRA HP. The 1963 engines with the same engine specs are rated at a 400 HP ( 365 NHRA) and 425 HP ( 385 NHRA) All are Stick shift... Wouldn't the 1962 409 HP 409 with 2x4's be the one to run? (370 NHRA Factored)
__________________
Adger Smith (Former SS) Last edited by Adger Smith; 01-06-2019 at 10:32 PM. Reason: correction |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#5 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Glendora,Calif.
Posts: 1,136
Likes: 172
Liked 705 Times in 219 Posts
|
![]()
I guess a few persons wanted to check out the specs on the 409- the original cam in a '62 380 or 409 horse engine ended in part #930, it had .439" lift on both valves.It was a carryover from the small port '61 360 horse 409. A running change was the 3830690 cam, it had .507 intake lift, .519 exhaust lift. NHRA let you use it without any horsepower penalty. The '63 engine used the same cam, but it didn't seem to get a horsepower break, the engine was rated at 400 horsepower or 425 horsepower. The only difference between the '62 hi po 409 and the '63 was the chrome valve covers, air cleaner, and dipstick,and the '63 cast iron exhaust manifolds were a cast iron header that did work better than the 2 1/2" outlet rams horns on the '62 motor, but you wouldn't use either one on a race car. The '62 engine and car is the one to build.The two engines allow the OEM head, the #690 casting, with the #583 head as a legal replacement. The 583 came on the '64 400 and 425 horse engine and the '65 400 horse engine. Only difference was that the valve spring seats were deepened and taller valve springs were used on that head to eliminate coil bind and to enhance spring life. They are more rare than the 690 heads. Have fun rounding up all these parts, and building these engines!! Oh,yes, the dual 4 barrel intakes are the same for all years.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,125
Likes: 1,179
Liked 684 Times in 289 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
MJ |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#7 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,818
Likes: 2,908
Liked 5,126 Times in 1,954 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Go here, and you guys won't have to guess all the time: http://www.classracerinfo.com/ -39 h.p. from NHRA is a fair amount of help, I'd say. Still too heavy for G/Stock. Ray and Dennis built that car when there wasn't many good tires around, no 3 to 1 first gears, etc. , plus the record was in the 13's. Also , there wasn't a Camaro in every possible class. You'd break that think in half trying to be competitive in G/Stock , in today's world.
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers Last edited by Mark Yacavone; 01-05-2019 at 10:00 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#8 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,125
Likes: 1,179
Liked 684 Times in 289 Posts
|
![]()
I saw they gave them end of year HP help.They should give them another 20hp and whatever the 62 Fords need too.
Not sure if the Mopar needs help, but why not help all the old iron? So few of them left. Let them race! MJ |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#9 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,496
Likes: 3,600
Liked 7,763 Times in 1,741 Posts
|
![]()
We've got an old thread for that too Mike! I'll bring it back to the top!
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm not spending 100K to win 2K |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,125
Likes: 1,179
Liked 684 Times in 289 Posts
|
![]()
Thanks Billy
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|