|
![]() |
#21 |
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,823
Likes: 2,166
Liked 2,354 Times in 554 Posts
|
![]()
Yep. Seems like the rules have changed just a tad since 1971 too. Surely you wouldn't want me to add 400 lbs of lead just to replace all the Federally mandated stuff that I get to remove?
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#22 |
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,823
Likes: 2,166
Liked 2,354 Times in 554 Posts
|
![]()
I see that they fixed the HP to .85 today.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,855
Likes: 83
Liked 444 Times in 145 Posts
|
![]()
Gump, you sure have a selective memory. Shipping weight and Horsepower continue to be the standard unless you are a member of the chosen few. You don't get to remove one pound from the shipping weight until after the car has been classified. Nice try though.
__________________
Bruce Noland 1788 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Fulton County, PA
Posts: 614
Likes: 16
Liked 920 Times in 259 Posts
|
![]()
The easy thing for NHRA to do would be to make the transbrakes legal like they did with the Heavy/Pro/Footbrake cars in D1. But they wouldn't go there, would they?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,823
Likes: 2,166
Liked 2,354 Times in 554 Posts
|
![]()
Uh...the car was classified without all that stuff in it.....That's what the factories have been submitting for quite a while now....
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#26 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,937
Likes: 131
Liked 369 Times in 127 Posts
|
![]()
Yep.
It's now 413 fact. h.p. for the 1320 Challenger @ 3400 lbs. I believe that now makes the car a natural A car ( 8.23 lbs./hp )
__________________
Alan Mackin Stock 3777/ SS 3377 P/SA & SS/PA Fox Thunderbird I/PS '95 Mustang GT Last edited by ALMACK; 04-18-2019 at 07:20 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Liked 124 Times in 9 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: malden,ma
Posts: 246
Likes: 272
Liked 94 Times in 38 Posts
|
![]()
don't care what brand you like, that's cool
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#29 |
Live Reporter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hickory, Ky
Posts: 10,638
Likes: 1,929
Liked 10,702 Times in 2,228 Posts
|
![]()
Thanks Dave. Please keep it up!
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#30 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 872
Likes: 1
Liked 502 Times in 130 Posts
|
![]()
Always good to see cars put in the guide.
I think it could possibly be a interesting bracket car, with a warranty, and might lead new blood into the stock and superstock arena. Especially if Ford and GM, put out their own like minded models. Then and only then would the subject matter of a car like this competing as is in stock be something to talk about. Own class, etc. Could it happen, who knows. Now the economics of currently building one of these for stock and superstock, aren't that compelling, as a 45K entry point or so is just the beginning. 100K done would likely be reasonable. Someone might do it, a wrecked car would be more $ reasonable. @ 413 HP I don't think it looks like a good package. I leave it up to those in the know on the delta between this motor and the Indy motors from last year in the Camaro, etc. A original E-Body 70 like mine or Jerry in Texas would be a better use of $ to go run at the windmills of A-Stock and A-Stick. If you want to play, be prepared to pay. Its a bonfire of the cash, of that all must agree, whether its a 69 big block camaro, a new Camaro, a new challenger, a new mustang, or even a old challenger or cuda...... Eric
__________________
Eric Merryfield 1883 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
|
|